PAIS: paracetamol (acetaminophen) in stroke; protocol for a randomized, double blind clinical trial. [ISCRTN74418480] (vol 8, pg 29, 2008)

被引:9
作者
den Hertog, Heleen M. [1 ]
van der Worp, H. Bart [2 ]
van Gemert, H. Maarten A.
Algra, Ale [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kappelle, L. Jaap [2 ]
van Gijn, Jan [2 ]
Koudstaal, Peter J. [1 ]
Dippel, Diederik W. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Rudolf Magnus Inst Neurosci, Dept Neurol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, NL-2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2261-8-29
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) In Stroke ( PAIS) study is a phase III multicenter, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of high-dose acetaminophen in patients with acute stroke. The trial compares treatment with a daily dose of 6 g acetaminophen, started within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms, with matched placebo. The purpose of this study is to assess whether treatment with acetaminophen for 3 days will result in improved functional outcome through a modest reduction in body temperature and prevention of fever. The previously planned statistical analysis based on a dichotomization of the scores on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) may not make the most efficient use of the available baseline information. Therefore, the planned primary analysis of the PAIS study has been changed from fixed dichotomization of the mRS to a sliding dichotomy analysis. Methods: Instead of taking a single definition of good outcome for all patients, the definition is tailored to each individual patient's baseline prognosis on entry into the trial. Conclusion: The protocol change was initiated because of both advances in statistical approaches and to increase the efficiency of the trial by improving statistical power.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Can we improve the statistical analysis of stroke trials? Statistical reanalysis of functional outcomes in stroke trials [J].
Bath, Philip M. W. .
STROKE, 2007, 38 (06) :1911-1915
[2]  
HERTOG HMD, 2008, BMC CARDIOVASC DISOR, V8, P29
[3]  
JENNETT B, 1975, LANCET, V1, P480
[4]   STANDARDIZED ESTIMATES FROM CATEGORICAL REGRESSION-MODELS [J].
JOFFE, MM ;
GREENLAND, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (19) :2131-2141
[5]   NXY-059 for acute ischemic stroke [J].
Lees, KR ;
Zivin, JA ;
Ashwood, T ;
Davalos, A ;
Davis, SM ;
Diener, H ;
Grotta, J ;
Lyden, P ;
Shuaib, A ;
Hårdemark, H ;
Wasiewski, WW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (06) :588-600
[6]   Design and analysis of Phase III trials with ordered outcome scales: The concept of the sliding dichotomy [J].
Murray, GD ;
Barer, D ;
Choi, S ;
Fernandes, H ;
Gregson, B ;
Lees, KR ;
Maas, AIR ;
Marmarou, A ;
Mendelow, AD ;
Steyerberg, EW ;
Taylor, GS ;
Teasdale, GM ;
Weir, CJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2005, 22 (05) :511-517
[7]  
MURRAY GD, 2006, J NEUROTRAUM, P735
[8]   Novel end point analytic techniques and interpreting shifts across the entire range of outcome scales in acute stroke trials [J].
Saver, Jeffrey L. .
STROKE, 2007, 38 (11) :3055-3062
[9]   Shift analysis versus dichotomization of the modified rankin scale outcome scores in the NINDS and ECASS-II trials [J].
Savitz, Sean I. ;
Lew, Robert ;
Bluhmki, Erich ;
Hacke, Werner ;
Fisher, Marc .
STROKE, 2007, 38 (12) :3205-3212
[10]   PAIS: Paracetamol (acetaminophen) in stroke; protocol for a randomized, double blind clinical trial. [ISCRTN 74418480] [J].
van Breda E.J. ;
van der Worp H.B. ;
van Gemert H.M.A. ;
Algra A. ;
Kappelle L.J. ;
van Gijn J. ;
Koudstaal P.J. ;
Dippel D.W.J. .
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 5 (1)