Biomechanical behaviour of a prosthetic lumbar nucleus

被引:31
作者
Eysel, P
Rompe, JD
Schoenmayr, R
Zoellner, J
机构
[1] Orthopaed Univ Hosp, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
[2] HSK Dr Horst Schmidt Kliniken GmbH, Dept Neurosurg, Wiesbaden, Germany
关键词
prosthetic lumbar nucleus; artificial disc; biomechanical investigation;
D O I
10.1007/s007010050486
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study is to determine the significance of an artificial nucleus implant for lumbar discs (PDN device) with special regard to the biomechanical properties of the spinal motion segment. From 11 human cadavers the lumbar segment L2/L3 was harvested, the lamina and the muscles were removed with care to preserve the anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments. The segments were fixed on a special testing device mounted in universal testing machine (Zwick, Ulm-Germany). Physiological load with maximum of 7 Nm was applied in flexion/extension, right and left sidebending and right and left torsion. The movement of the measuring point (center of L2) was registered along three axes (sagittal, frontal and vertical axis). Three cycles of measurement were performed in all specimens: a) the intact segment, b) segment after nucleotomy, c) segment with 2 PDN devices. There was a statisticaly significant (p < 0.05) increase in segmental mobility in all directions after nucleotomy with an increased mobility of the segment between 38 and 100 percent. After introduction of two PDN implants there was a restoration of segmental mobility for all movement-directions with no statistically significant difference compared with the intact situation before nucleotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1083 / 1087
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   CHANGE OF DISK HEIGHT, RADIAL DISK BULGE, AND INTRADISCAL PRESSURE FROM DISCECTOMY - AN INVITRO INVESTIGATION ON HUMAN LUMBAR DISKS [J].
BRINCKMANN, P ;
GROOTENBOER, H .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (06) :641-646
[2]  
BUETTNERJANZ K, 1998, Z ORTHOP, V136, p3A20
[3]  
BUETTNERJANZ K, 1989, INT ORTHOP SICOT, V13, P173
[4]   Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years [J].
Cinotti, G ;
David, T ;
Postacchini, F .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (08) :995-1000
[5]   THE OUTCOME OF SURGERY FOR LUMBAR-DISK HERNIATION .1. A 4-17 YEARS FOLLOW-UP WITH EMPHASIS ON SOMATIC ASPECTS [J].
DVORAK, J ;
GAUCHAT, MH ;
VALACH, L .
SPINE, 1988, 13 (12) :1418-1422
[6]  
EYRE D, 1989, NEW PERSPECTIVES ON LOW BACK PAIN, P147
[7]  
EYSEL P, 1994, UNFALLCHIRURG, V97, P451
[8]   COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF DIFFERENT DORSAL STABILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN RECENT THORACOLUMBAR SPINE FRACTURES [J].
EYSEL, P ;
MEINIG, G .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1991, 109 (1-2) :12-19
[9]  
EYSEL P, 1998, INFLUENCE INTRADISCA, P7
[10]  
FERNSTROM U, 1966, ACTA CHIR SCAND S, V355, P154