Prediction of 6-month survival after liver transplantation using cox regression

被引:9
作者
Avolio, AW
Chirico, ASA
Agnes, S
Sganga, G
Gaspari, R
Frongillo, F
Pepe, G
Castagneto, M
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Div Organ Transplantat, Policlin A Gemelli, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Anesthesiol, Policlin A Gemelli, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.02.024
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The outcome of liver transplantation (LTx) has been correlated with several donor and recipient factors. Methods. A database of 191 consecutive LTx cases was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression statistics based on 80 variables. To avoid additional effects of late events on patient survival, the chosen endpoint was 6 months. Data were evaluated using SPSS statistical software. Results. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a difference in 1- to 6-month graft survival between patients transplanted with organs from donors older versus younger than 60 years (Breslow, P < .01). Differences in 1- to 6-month graft survivals were observed between patients listed as UNOS status 3, 2B, 2A, and 1: the outcomes for UNOS status 2B versus UNOS status 2A and UNOS status 2B versus status 1 were significant (P < .05). Differences in 1- to 6-month graft survival rates were found between patients with versus without sepsis (P < .05), and with versus without rejection episodes (P < .01). Cox regression analysis revealed only three of the variables to be independent prognostic predictors of graft failure: donor age; postoperative septic status; and rejection. The best mathematical multivariate Cox regression model linked donor age + donor Na + rejection + sepsis to 1- to 6-month graft survival (chi-square = 29.06, P < .001). Conclusion. Factors predictive of 1- to 6-month graft survival after liver transplantation include donor age; UNOS status; sepsis; and rejection.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 532
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
AGNES S, 1992, TRANSPLANT INT S, V9, pS469
[2]  
Avolio A W, 1998, Transpl Int, V11 Suppl 1, pS224, DOI 10.1007/s001470050466
[3]   Outcome of liver transplantation after acute rejection and sepsis [J].
Avolio, AW ;
Agnes, S ;
Chirico, ASA ;
Citterio, F ;
Montemagno, S ;
Castagneto, M .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (08) :3962-3966
[4]  
AVOLIO AW, 1991, TRANSPLANT P, V23, P2451
[5]  
AVOLIO AW, TRANSPLANT P, V25, P1868
[6]   The impact of donor factors on the outcomes following liver transplantation [J].
Buell, JF ;
Cronin, DC ;
Blahnik, L ;
Lo, A ;
Trimbach, C ;
Layman, R ;
Millis, JM .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (05) :1495-1496
[7]   Effect of donor age on graft outcome after liver transplantation [J].
Grande, L ;
Matus, D ;
Manyalic, M ;
Cabrer, C ;
Rodriguez-Montalvo, C ;
Rimola, A ;
Navasa, M ;
Garcia-Valdecasas, JC ;
Visa, J .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (06) :2482-2483
[8]   THE USE OF MARGINAL DONORS FOR LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 365 LIVER-DONORS [J].
MOR, E ;
KLINTMALM, GB ;
GONWA, TA ;
SOLOMON, H ;
HOLMAN, MJ ;
GIBBS, JF ;
WATEMBERG, I ;
GOLDSTEIN, RM ;
HUSBERG, BS .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1992, 53 (02) :383-386
[9]  
MULLER AR, 2000, TRANSPLANT INT S, V13, P158
[10]   RISK OF INFECTION AFTER PENETRATING ABDOMINAL-TRAUMA [J].
NICHOLS, RL ;
SMITH, JW ;
KLEIN, DB ;
TRUNKEY, DD ;
COOPER, RH ;
ADINOLFI, MF ;
MILLS, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 311 (17) :1065-1070