Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition

被引:150
作者
Howard, LA [1 ]
Tipper, SP [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WALES,SCH PSYCHOL,CTR PERCEPT ATTENT & MOTOR SCI,BANGOR LL57 2DG,GWYNEDD,WALES
关键词
inhibition; reaching-to-grasp; interference; attention; path-deviation; human;
D O I
10.1007/BF02454150
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Previous research has demonstrated that when a stimulus is to be ignored, the path of motion towards a target (saccade or manual reach) deviates away from the to-be-ignored stimulus. Path deviations in saccade and reaching tasks have, however, been observed in very different situations. In the saccade tasks subjects initially attended to a cue, then disengaged attention while saccading to a target. By contrast, in the selective reaching tasks attention was continuously withdrawn from the to-be-ignored stimulus, as this was irrelevant throughout the experiment. In the two experiments reported here, cues similar to those studied in saccade tasks are examined with selective reaching procedures. Experiment 1 shows that when a coloured light-emitting diode cue, upon which subjects engage and then subsequently disengage attention, is close to the responding hand, the hand deviates away from the cue. Experiment 2 confirms this cue avoidance by showing that, compared with central fixation alone, the hand veers away from a central cue. These results confirm that the path deviations observed in saccades can also be obtained in manual reaching movements. Such findings support the notion that eye and hand movements are both affected by inhibitory mechanisms of attention.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   INHIBITION OF RETURN - EFFECTS OF ATTENTIONAL CUEING ON EYE-MOVEMENT LATENCIES [J].
ABRAMS, RA ;
DOBKIN, RS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1994, 20 (03) :467-477
[2]  
Barbieri C, 1989, Behav Neurol, V2, P13, DOI 10.3233/BEN-1989-2102
[3]  
BIGUER B, 1985, ATTENTION PERFORM, V11, P189
[4]   GRASPING VERSUS POINTING AND THE DIFFERENTIAL USE OF VISUAL FEEDBACK [J].
CARNAHAN, H ;
GOODALE, MA ;
MARTENIUK, RG .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 12 (03) :219-234
[5]   A PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE CONTINUOUS-FLOW MODEL OF HUMAN INFORMATION-PROCESSING [J].
COLES, MGH ;
GRATTON, G ;
BASHORE, TR ;
ERIKSEN, CW ;
DONCHIN, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1985, 11 (05) :529-533
[6]  
DUHAMEL JR, 1992, SCIENCE, V255, P90, DOI 10.1126/science.1553535
[7]   EFFECTS OF NOISE LETTERS UPON IDENTIFICATION OF A TARGET LETTER IN A NONSEARCH TASK [J].
ERIKSEN, BA ;
ERIKSEN, CW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (01) :143-149
[8]  
Eriksen C. W., 1995, VIS COGN, V2, P101, DOI DOI 10.1080/13506289508401726
[9]   PARIETAL LOBE MECHANISMS OF SPATIAL ATTENTION - MODALITY-SPECIFIC OR SUPRAMODAL [J].
FARAH, MJ ;
WONG, AB ;
MONHEIT, MA ;
MORROW, LA .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1989, 27 (04) :461-470
[10]  
FINDLAY JM, 1992, EYE MOVEMENTS VISUAL, P8