Working Memory Training for Healthy Older Adults: The Role of Individual Characteristics in Explaining Shortand Long-Term Gains

被引:62
作者
Borella, Erika [1 ]
Carbone, Elena [1 ]
Pastore, Massimiliano [2 ]
De Beni, Rossana [1 ]
Carretti, Barbara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Gen Psychol, Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Dev & Social Psychol, Padua, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2017年 / 11卷
关键词
working memory training; older adults; age; working memory baseline performance; general cognitive ability; training benefits; individual differences; individual characteristics; AGE-DIFFERENCES; COGNITIVE PLASTICITY; INHIBITORY CONTROL; NORMATIVE DATA; YOUNG; BENEFITS; INTERFERENCE; TASKS; INTELLIGENCE; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2017.00099
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of the present study was to explore whether individual characteristics such as age, education, vocabulary, and baseline performance in a working memory (WM) task-similar to the one used in the training (criterion task)-predict the short-and long-term specific gains and transfer effects of a verbal WM training for older adults. Method: Four studies that adopted the Borella et al. (2010) verbal WM training procedure were found eligible for our analysis as they included: healthy older adults who attended either the training sessions (WM training group), or alternative activities (active control group); the same measures for assessing specific gains (on the criterion WM task), and transfer effects (nearest on a visuo-spatial WM task, near on short-term memory tasks and far on a measure of fluid intelligence, a measure of processing speed and two inhibitory measures); and a follow-up session. Results: Linear mixed models confirmed the overall efficacy of the training, in the short-term at least, and some maintenance effects. In the trained group, the individual characteristics considered were found to contribute (albeit only modestly in some cases) to explaining the effects of the training. Conclusions: Overall, our findings suggest the importance of taking individual characteristics and individual differences into account when examiningWMtraining gains in older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PROCEDURAL CODING MA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R and BUGS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, STAN MOD LANG US GUI
[4]  
[Anonymous], TRAITE SCI COGNITIV
[5]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[7]   Who benefits from memory training? [J].
Bissig, David ;
Lustig, Cindy .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (08) :720-726
[8]   Aging and verbal memory span: A meta-analysis [J].
Bopp, KL ;
Verhaeghen, P .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2005, 60 (05) :P223-P233
[9]  
Borella E., PSYCHOL AGI IN PRESS
[10]   Working memory and inhibition across the adult life-span [J].
Borella, Erika ;
Carretti, Barbara ;
De Beni, Rossana .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2008, 128 (01) :33-44