Screening for depression in high-risk groups: prospective cohort study in general practice

被引:34
作者
Baas, Kim D. [1 ]
Wittkampf, Karin A. [1 ,2 ]
van Weert, Henk C. [2 ]
Lucassen, Peter [3 ]
Huyser, Jochanan [1 ]
van den Hoogen, Henk [3 ]
van de Lisdonk, Eloy [3 ]
Bindels, Patrick E. [2 ]
Bockting, Claudi L. [2 ]
Ruhe, Henricus G. [1 ]
Schene, Aart H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Gen Practice, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
PRIMARY-CARE; IDENTIFYING DEPRESSION; FREQUENT ATTENDANCE; MAJOR DEPRESSION; FOLLOW-UP; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; ANXIETY; RECOGNITION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1192/bjp.bp.107.046052
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Background Currently only about half of the people who have major depressive disorder are detected cluing regular health care. Screening in high-risk groups might be a possible solution. AIMS To evaluate the effectiveness of selective screening for major depressive disorder in three high-risk groups in primary care: people with mental health problems, people with unexplained somatic complaints and people who frequently attend their general practitioner. Method Prospective cohort study among 2005 people in high-risk groups in three health centres in The Netherlands. Results Of the 2005 people identified, 1687 were invited for screening and of these 780 participated. Screening disclosed 71 people with major depressive disorder 36 (50.7%) already received treatment, 14 (19.7%) refused treatment and 4 individuals did not show up for an appointment. As a final result of the screening, 17 individuals (1% of 1687) started treatment for major depressive disorder. Conclusions Screening for depression in high-risk Populations does not seem to be effective, mainly because of the low rates of treatment initiation, even if treatment is freely and easily accessible.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 403
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Effect of the addition of a "help" question to two screening questions on specificity for diagnosis of depression in general practice: diagnostic validity study [J].
Arroll, B ;
Goodyear-Smith, F ;
Kerse, N ;
Fishman, T ;
Gunn, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7521) :884-886A
[2]
World federation of societies of biological psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders in primary care [J].
Bauer, Michael ;
Bschor, Tom ;
Pfennig, Andrea ;
Whybrow, Peter C. ;
Angst, Jules ;
Versiani, Marcio ;
Moeller, Hans-Juergen .
WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 8 (02) :67-104
[3]
Dowrick CF, 2000, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V50, P361
[4]
First M.B., 2002, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders
[5]
GEBEL RS, 2000, ICPC 1 MET NEDERLAND
[6]
Case management to improve major depression in primary health care: a systematic review [J].
Gensichen, J ;
Beyer, M ;
Muth, C ;
Gerlach, FM ;
Von Korff, M ;
Ormel, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2006, 36 (01) :7-14
[7]
Health policy - Should we screen for depression? [J].
Gilbody, S ;
Sheldon, T ;
Wessely, S .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7548) :1027-1030
[8]
Educational and organizational interventions to improve the management of depression in primary care - A systematic review [J].
Gilbody, S ;
Whitty, P ;
Grimshaw, J ;
Thomas, R .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (23) :3145-3151
[9]
GILBODY S, 2005, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V2
[10]
Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review [J].
Gilbody, SM ;
House, AO ;
Sheldon, TA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7283) :406-409