R&D determinants: Accounting for the differences between research and development

被引:88
作者
Barge-Gil, Andres [1 ]
Lopez, Alberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, Dept Fundamentos Anal Econ 2, Madrid 28223, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, Dept Fundamentos Anal Econ 1, Madrid 28223, Spain
关键词
R&D determinants; Schumpeterian hypotheses; Demand pull; Technological opportunity; Appropriability; MARKET-STRUCTURE; DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT; MANUFACTURING FIRMS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; INNOVATION POLICY; BASIC RESEARCH; PRODUCTIVITY; SIZE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.017
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
120117 [社会管理工程];
摘要
The determinants of R&D are an important topic of innovation studies. The classical Schumpeterian hypotheses about the influence of size and market power have been complemented with the role played by industry determinants, such as demand pull, technological opportunity and appropriability, in determining R&D investments. However, R&D has always been considered as a whole, even though research and development activities differ in many aspects. We take advantage of a new panel database of innovative Spanish firms (PITEC) to distinguish between research and development efforts of firms. We analyze the differentiated role played by traditional R&D determinants in driving research and development. Results show that demand pull and appropriability have a higher effect on development, while technological opportunity is more influential for research. Differences are statistically significant, important in magnitude, and robust to the use of different indicators for demand pull, technological opportunity and appropriability, and to several robustness checks. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1634 / 1648
页数:15
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]
Understanding co-operative innovative activity: evidence from four European countries [J].
Abramovsky, Laura ;
Kremp, Elisabeth ;
Lopez, Alberto ;
Schmidt, Tobias ;
Simpson, Helen .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 18 (03) :243-265
[2]
Aerts K, 2008, MSL0811 FBE KU LEUV
[3]
Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bloom, N ;
Blundell, R ;
Griffith, R ;
Howitt, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2005, 120 (02) :701-728
[4]
Restructuring Research: Communication Costs and the Democratization of University Innovation [J].
Agrawal, Ajay ;
Goldfarb, Avi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (04) :1578-1590
[5]
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[6]
[Anonymous], 2002, PRACTICE SURVEYS RES
[7]
[Anonymous], 2001, R D STRATEGY ORG MAN
[8]
Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations [J].
Arnold, E .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2004, 13 (01) :3-17
[9]
Arrow K., 1962, RATE DIRECTION INVEN, P609
[10]
Long-run versus short-run decisions: R&D and market structure in Spanish firms [J].
Artes, Joaquin .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (01) :120-132