Selective diagnostic cervical nerve root block -: correlation with clinical symptoms and MRI-pathology

被引:31
作者
Anderberg, L [1 ]
Annertz, M
Brandt, L
Säveland, H
机构
[1] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Neuroradiol, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
关键词
cervical spine; radiculopathy; root-block; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00701-004-0241-4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The aim of this study is to describe the method of a cervical selective diagnostic nerve root block (SNRB) technique and assess its ability to correlate clinical symptoms with MRI findings in patients with cervical radicular pain and a single level degenerative disease. Methods. Twenty consecutive patients with cervical radiculopathy and correlating single level MRI pathology were studied. All patients underwent clinical investigation and neck and arm pain measurement with visual analog scales (VAS). The last 10 consecutive patients also underwent provocation with active neck motion when arm and neck pain were measured. They all underwent SNRB and 1 ml local-anesthesia (Mepivacaine 10 mg/ml) was injected, with the aid of fluoroscopy, close to the nerve-root. The VAS estimation and clinical investigation including provocation were repeated 30 minutes after the block. Criteria for a positive block response are a significant subjective pain reduction and at least 50% VAS pain reduction in the arm. Findings. For the whole group mean VAS arm pain reductions were 86% and mean VAS neck pain reductions were 65%. When the results from the provocation were added all patients had a positive block. Eighteen were operated on by an anterior procedure and all 18 were free from radicular pain at follow up. Interpretation. The block procedure seems relevant for revealing a relationship between radiological pathology and clinical symptoms and signs.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 565
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Bartlett RJV, 1996, NEURORADIOLOGY, V38, P142
[2]   A comparison of T2 and gadolinium enhanced MRI with CT myelography in cervical radiculopathy [J].
Bartlett, RJV ;
Hill, CR ;
Gardiner, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (841) :11-19
[3]   Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of patients with occult cervical spine injury [J].
Benzel, EC ;
Hart, BL ;
Ball, PA ;
Baldwin, NG ;
Orrison, WW ;
Espinosa, MC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 85 (05) :824-829
[4]   ABNORMAL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE SCANS OF THE CERVICAL-SPINE IN ASYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS - A PROSPECTIVE INVESTIGATION [J].
BODEN, SD ;
MCCOWIN, PR ;
DAVIS, DO ;
DINA, TS ;
MARK, AS ;
WIESEL, S .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 72A (08) :1178-1184
[5]   THE CLINICAL ANATOMY OF THE CERVICAL DORSAL RAMI [J].
BOGDUK, N .
SPINE, 1982, 7 (04) :319-330
[6]  
CATTERALL W, 2001, GOODMAN GILMANS PHAR, P367
[7]   Nerve growth factor expression and innervation of the painful intervertebral disc [J].
Freemont, AJ ;
Watkins, A ;
Le Maitre, C ;
Baird, P ;
Jeziorska, M ;
Knight, MTN ;
Ross, ERS ;
O'Brien, JP ;
Hoyland, JA .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2002, 197 (03) :286-292
[8]   Cervical discography: Clinical implications from 12 years of experience [J].
Grubb, SA ;
Kelly, CK .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1382-1389
[9]  
Hildebrandt J, 2001, SCHMERZ, V15, P474, DOI 10.1007/PL00009801
[10]  
Jonsson B, 1988, J Spinal Disord, V1, P232