Interpretive criteria and quality control parameters for testing of susceptibilities of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae to trimethoprim and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

被引:7
作者
Fuchs, PC
Barry, AL
Brown, SD
Aldridge, K
Allen, S
Doern, G
Ferraro, MJ
Hardy, D
Jenkins, S
Runner, J
Sewell, D
Thornsberry, C
机构
关键词
ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; HEMOPHILUS-INFLUENZAE; CONTROL LIMITS; AGENTS; PREVALENCE; INVITRO;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.35.1.125-131.1997
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Two hundred twenty-eight strains of Haemophilus influenzae and 234 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae were tested by broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods for susceptibility to trimethoprim (TMP) and TMP-sulfamethoxazole (SMX) to evaluate proposed criteria. Data are presented to support the proposed TMP MIC breakpoints of less than or equal to 2.0 mu g/ml for susceptibility and greater than or equal to 4.0 mu g/ml for resistance for both species and TMP-SMX MIC breakpoints of less than or equal to 2.0-38 mu g/ml for susceptibility and greater than or equal to 4.0-76 mu g/ml for resistance. Corresponding zone diameter breakpoints for H. influenzae for both drugs are proposed: less than or equal to 10 mm = resistant; greater than or equal to 16 mm susceptible. A 10-laboratory study documented reproducibility of such tests with standard control strains. The following control limits are proposed for tests of H. influenzae ATCC 49247 against TMP: MIC, 0.12 to 0.5 mu g/ml; zone diameter, 27 to 33 mm. The current limits for TMP-SMX were confirmed, For tests of S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619, MICs of TMP were 1.0 to 4.0 mu g/ml and the current TMP-SMX MIC range was confirmed., Disk susceptibility tests of either drug against pneumococci were not reproducible, and consequently neither quality control limits nor interpretive criteria could be established. Endpoint interpretation and lot-to-lot variability in Mueller-Hinton agars were significant factors leading to interlaboratory variability.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 131
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AHMED M, COMMUNICATION
[2]  
ASHFORD JJ, 1982, BRIT J CLIN PRACT, V36, P152
[3]  
BACKHOUSE CI, 1985, PRACTITIONER, V229, P51
[4]   QUALITY-CONTROL LIMITS FOR MICRODILUTION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS WITH AZTREONAM, IMIPENEM, CEFTRIAXONE, CEFTAZIDIME, CEFTIZOXIME, CEFUROXIME, AND CEFONICID [J].
BARRY, AL ;
GAVAN, TL ;
JONES, RN ;
AYERS, LW ;
FUCHS, PC ;
GERLACH, EH ;
THORNSBERRY, C .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1987, 7 (01) :83-87
[5]   STATISTICAL CRITERIA FOR SELECTING QUALITY-CONTROL LIMITS FOR BROTH MICRODILUTION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS WITH 39 DIFFERENT ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS [J].
BARRY, AL ;
FUCHS, PC ;
JONES, RN .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1989, 12 (05) :413-420
[6]   IN-VITRO ACTIVITIES OF 12 ORALLY-ADMINISTERED ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AGAINST 4 SPECIES OF BACTERIAL RESPIRATORY PATHOGENS FROM US-MEDICAL-CENTERS IN 1992 AND 1993 [J].
BARRY, AL ;
PFALLER, MA ;
FUCHS, PC ;
PACKER, RR .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1994, 38 (10) :2419-2425
[7]   A NATIONAL COLLABORATIVE STUDY OF RESISTANCE TO ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN HAEMOPHILUS-INFLUENZAE IN AUSTRALIAN HOSPITALS [J].
COLLIGNON, PJ ;
BELL, JM ;
MACINNES, SJ ;
GILBERT, GL ;
TOOHEY, M .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1992, 30 (02) :153-163
[8]   NATIONAL COLLABORATIVE STUDY OF THE PREVALENCE OF ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE AMONG CLINICAL ISOLATES OF HEMOPHILUS-INFLUENZAE [J].
DOERN, GV ;
JORGENSEN, JH ;
THORNSBERRY, C ;
PRESTON, DA ;
TUBERT, T ;
REDDING, JS ;
MAHER, LA .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1988, 32 (02) :180-185
[9]   INVITRO STUDIES OF CIPROFLOXACIN AND SURVEY OF RESISTANCE PATTERNS IN CURRENT ISOLATES [J].
FERNANDES, CJ ;
ACKERMAN, VP .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1990, 13 (02) :79-91
[10]   QUALITY-CONTROL LIMITS FOR AMPICILLIN, CARBENICILLIN, MEZLOCILLIN, AND PIPERACILLIN DISK DIFFUSION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS - A COLLABORATIVE STUDY [J].
GAVAN, TL ;
JONES, RN ;
BARRY, AL ;
FUCHS, PC ;
GERLACH, EH ;
MATSEN, JM ;
RELLER, LB ;
THORNSBERRY, C ;
THRUPP, LD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1981, 14 (01) :67-72