Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study

被引:307
作者
Bruin, KJ
Wijers, AA
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Ophthalmol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
response inhibition; go/nogo task; response mode; stimulus probability; N2; P3;
D O I
10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00141-4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: In the present study, effects of response mode (finger movement or counting) and stimulus probability on inhibitory processes were studied. Methods: Electroencephalographic activity was registered in a visual go/nogo paradigm. Subjects either responded manually to go stimuli or counted silently the occurrence of each go stimulus in different conditions. In both response mode conditions, response probability was varied. Results: For finger movement and counting, similar N2 and P3 go/nogo effects were found. The amplitude of the nogo N2 and nogo P3 varied as a negative function of nogo stimulus probability. The go P3 varied as a negative function of go stimulus probability. In the manual condition, however, the descending flank of the go N2 at anterior electrode sites was more negative in the 0.50go and 0.75go probability trials than in the 0.25go probability trials. Conclusions: The results of the present study confirm the hypothesis that differences between go and nogo event-related potentials are not dependent on overt movement-related potentials. It could be speculated that the probability effect on the N2 amplitude in go trials in the manual condition has to be explained in terms of a modulation of the strength of motoric preparation processes varying as a positive function of the probability of the go stimulus. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1172 / 1182
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]
Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? [J].
Bruin, KJ ;
Wijers, AA ;
van Staveren, ASJ .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (09) :1660-1671
[2]
A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a Go-No-Go task [J].
Casey, BJ ;
Trainor, RJ ;
Orendi, JL ;
Schubert, AB ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Giedd, JN ;
Castellanos, FX ;
Haxby, JV ;
Noll, DC ;
Cohen, JD ;
Forman, SD ;
Dahl, RE ;
Rapoport, JL .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 9 (06) :835-847
[3]
STIMULUS NOVELTY, TASK RELEVANCE AND VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIAL IN MAN [J].
COURCHESNE, E ;
HILLYARD, SA ;
GALAMBOS, R .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1975, 39 (02) :131-143
[4]
CZIGLER I, 1994, J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V8, P193
[5]
Aging, stimulus identification and the effect of probability: An event-related potential study [J].
Czigler, I ;
Csibra, G ;
Ambro, A .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 43 (01) :27-40
[6]
STIMULUS PROBABILITY AND MOTOR RESPONSE IN YOUNG AND OLD ADULTS - AN ERP STUDY [J].
DEJONG, HL ;
KOK, A ;
VANROOY, JCGM .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 29 (02) :125-148
[8]
IS THE P300 COMPONENT A MANIFESTATION OF CONTEXT UPDATING [J].
DONCHIN, E ;
COLES, MGH .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (03) :357-374
[9]
QUANTIFYING SURPRISE - VARIATION OF EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS WITH SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY [J].
DUNCANJOHNSON, CC ;
DONCHIN, E .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 14 (05) :456-467
[10]
THE P300 COMPONENT OF THE EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIAL AS AN INDEX OF INFORMATION-PROCESSING [J].
DUNCANJOHNSON, CC ;
DONCHIN, E .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 14 (1-2) :1-52