Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery

被引:91
作者
Duchene, David A.
Moinzadeh, Alireza
Gill, Inderbir S.
Clayman, Ralph V.
Winfield, Howard N.
机构
[1] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Urol, RCP 3235, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] SUNY Syracuse, Dept Urol, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol Inst, Sect Laparoscop & Robot Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Orange, CA 92668 USA
关键词
urology; laparoscopy; robotics; internship and residency; education; medical; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATOR; PRACTICE PATTERNS; UROLOGISTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.035
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determined the current status of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery in the United States and Canada. Materials and Methods: A total of 1,188 surveys were sent via the Internet to all 1,056 current urology residents and 132 program directors with an Internet address registered with the American Urological Association. Results: Responses were received from 372 residents (35%) and 56 program directors (42%). Of respondents 47% reported greater than 100 laparoscopic procedures performed yearly by 1 (36%) or more (51%) faculty members. Robotic procedures were performed at 54% of the institutions, mainly consisting of prostatectomy and pyeloplasty. At all institutions laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was performed and those at 69% of the institutions believed that it is the gold standard for renal tumors today. Urologists were involved in 87% of adrenal surgeries and 54% of respondents believed that is the gold standard approach. However, only 35% of respondents had participated in laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Of respondents 36%, 42% and 17% reported that laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was performed by only urologists, only a nonurology transplant team and shared equally, respectively. Of respondents 41% planned on performing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in the next year. Laparoscopic needle ablation renal surgery was done in 51% of the programs and percutaneous needle ablation was done in 63%. None of the respondents (0%) believed that it is the gold standard but 51% believed that ablative procedures look promising for renal tumors. Of respondents 39% had participated in robotic radical prostatectomy and 53% thought that it looked promising but was not the gold standard. Of respondents 31% believed that they will be performing robotic surgery after residency, 30% were unsure and 29% will not be using the robot. Overall 38% of residents thought that their laparoscopic experience was at least average or acceptable. Conclusions: A large number of laparoscopic urological procedures are being performed at training institutions with robotic procedures being performed at 54% of respondent facilities. Residents are participating in most cases but only 38% consider their laparoscopic experience to be satisfactory. A need still exists for increased laparoscopic training for residents, which can be accomplished by expanding training facilities and increasing the number of faculty members performing laparoscopic procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:2158 / 2166
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Complications of laparoscopic procedures after concentrated training in urological laparoscopy [J].
Cadeddu, JA ;
Wolfe, JS ;
Nakada, S ;
Chen, R ;
Shalhav, A ;
Bishoff, JT ;
Hamilton, B ;
Schulam, PG ;
Dunn, M ;
Hoenig, D ;
Fabrizio, M ;
Hedican, S ;
Averch, TD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2109-2111
[2]   Initial impact of a dedicated postgraduate laparoscopic mini-residency on clinical practice patterns [J].
Chou, DS ;
Abdelshehid, CS ;
Uribe, CA ;
Khonsari, SS ;
Eichel, L ;
Boker, JR ;
Shanberg, AM ;
Ahlering, TE ;
Clayman, RV ;
McDougall, EM .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (03) :360-365
[3]   Laparoscopic practice patterns among North American urologists 5 years after formal training [J].
Colegrove, PM ;
Winfield, HN ;
Donovan, JF ;
See, WA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (03) :881-886
[4]   Use of a virtual reality simulator for ureteroscopy training [J].
Jacomides, L ;
Ogan, K ;
Cadeddu, JA ;
Pearle, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (01) :320-323
[5]   Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers - Is one superior to the other? [J].
Munz, Y ;
Kumar, BD ;
Moorthy, K ;
Bann, S ;
Darzi, A .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (03) :485-494
[6]   Virtual ureteroscopy predicts ureteroscopic proficiency of medical students on a cadaver [J].
Ogan, K ;
Jacomides, L ;
Shulman, MJ ;
Roehrborn, CG ;
Cadeddu, JA ;
Pearle, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (02) :667-671
[7]   Laparoscopic training on bench models: Better and more cost effective than operating room experience? [J].
Scott, DJ ;
Bergen, PC ;
Rege, RV ;
Laycock, R ;
Tesfay, ST ;
Valentine, RJ ;
Euhus, DM ;
Jeyarajah, DR ;
Thompson, WM ;
Jones, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2000, 191 (03) :272-283
[8]   Training postgraduate urologists in laparoscopic surgery: The current challenge [J].
Shalhav, AL ;
Dabagia, MD ;
Wagner, TT ;
Koch, MO ;
Lingeman, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (05) :2135-2137
[9]   Urology practice patterns after residency training in laparoscopy [J].
Shay, BF ;
Thomas, R ;
Monga, M .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2002, 16 (04) :251-256
[10]   Survey of urological laparoscopic practice patterns in the midwest [J].
Wang, DS ;
Winfield, HN .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (06) :2282-2286