Perceived needs following traumatic brain injury

被引:120
作者
Corrigan, JD
Whiteneck, G
Mellick, D
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Craig Hosp, Dept Res, Englewood, CO USA
关键词
behavioral control; cognitive problems; employment; needs; traumatic brain injury;
D O I
10.1097/00001199-200405000-00002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: (1) Provide population-based estimates of perceived needs following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the prevalence of unmet needs 1 year postinjury; (2) identify relations among needs that define unique clusters of individuals; and (3) identify risk factors for experiencing selected needs. Design: Telephone survey 1 year after injury of a prospective cohort of all people hospitalized with TBI in the state of Colorado during 2000. Measures: Self-reported need for assistance in 13 areas of functioning. Results: A total of 58.8% of persons hospitalized with TBI experienced at least 1 need during the year following injury; 40.2% will experience at least 1 unmet need 1 year after injury. Most frequently experienced needs were "improving your memory, solving problems better"(34.1%), "managing stress, emotional upsets" (27.9%), and "managing your money, paying bills" (23.3%). Cluster analysis revealed 8 distinctive groupings of subjects. If a need existed, those least likely to be met involved cognitive abilities, employment, and alcohol and/or drug use. Conclusions: Results were consistent with findings from previous assessments of need for services based on surveys of convenience samples; however, the prevalence of unmet needs 1 year after injury may be higher than previously suspected. More post-hospital services addressing cognitive and emotional problems appear needed. Risk factors for experiencing needs suggest potential avenues for clinical intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 216
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Alves WM., 1986, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V1, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Guidelines for surveillance of central nervous system injury
[3]   Traumatic brain injury: Designing and implementing a population-based follow-up system [J].
Brooks, CA ;
Gabella, B ;
Hoffman, R ;
Sosin, D ;
Whiteneck, G .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (08) :S26-S30
[4]   Quality of life for individuals with traumatic brain injury: Comparison with others living in the community [J].
Brown, M ;
Vandergoot, D .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 1998, 13 (04) :1-23
[5]   Models for predicting subjective quality of life in individuals with traumatic brain injury [J].
Brown, M ;
Gordon, WA ;
Haddad, L .
BRAIN INJURY, 2000, 14 (01) :5-19
[6]   SEQUELAE ASSOCIATED WITH HEAD-INJURIES IN PATIENTS WHO WERE NOT HOSPITALIZED - A FOLLOW-UP SURVEY [J].
COONLEYHOGANSON, R ;
SACHS, N ;
DESAI, BT ;
WHITMAN, S .
NEUROSURGERY, 1984, 14 (03) :315-317
[7]  
Corrigan J D, 1994, NeuroRehabilitation, V4, P109, DOI 10.3233/NRE-1994-4207
[8]   Systematic bias in traumatic brain injury outcome studies because of loss to follow-up [J].
Corrigan, JD ;
Harrison-Felix, C ;
Bogner, J ;
Dijkers, M ;
Terrill, MS ;
Whiteneck, G .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (02) :153-160
[9]   Conducting statewide needs assessments for persons with traumatic brain injury [J].
Corrigan, JD .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2001, 16 (01) :1-19
[10]  
*DEP HHS, 1989, INT CLASS DIS