Environmental climate instruments in Romania: A comparative approach using dynamic CGE modelling

被引:25
作者
Loisel, Rodica [1 ]
机构
[1] CIRED CNRS, F-94736 Nogent Sur Marne, France
关键词
Tradable permits; Romania; Endogenous growth; TECHNICAL CHANGE; CO2; ABATEMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study simulates a CO2 permit market in Romania using a dynamic general equilibrium model. The carbon constraint is set at 20.7% below the reference emissions level for sectors eligible according to the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU-ETS). Free permit distribution enhances growth despite a severe emissions cap, because environmental regulation stimulates structural changes [Porter, M., 1991. American's green strategy. Scientific American 264, 168]. That is, grandfathering allows sectors additional resources to invest in developing technologies, but it also raises the CO2 abatement costs because of energy rebound effects from enhanced growth. Results under endogenous growth [Romer, P.M., 1990. Endogenous technological change. journal of Political Economy 98 (5), 71-102] are very similar to those obtained under an exogenous growth scenario [Ramsey, Y.F., 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. Economic journal 38, 543-559], as the substitution effects are responsible for the majority of variations; in addition, Romanian research activities are too modest to significantly impact this system. The abatement cost per unit of GDP is higher under endogenous growth, as spillover effects reduce incentives to invest. Technological diffusion continues to have a positive impact on economic growth, which counterbalances the free-riding attitude adopted by some energy-intensive sectors, such as glass and cement. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2190 / 2204
页数:15
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   A MODEL OF GROWTH THROUGH CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
AGHION, P ;
HOWITT, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (02) :323-351
[2]  
AMBEC S, 2001, 23 INRA ESR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1965, ECONOMETRIC APPROACH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Economic growth, 1995
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, STERN REV EC CLIMATE
[6]  
ARMINGTON PS, 1969, INT MONET FUND S PAP, V16, P159
[7]   Technical change and the marginal cost of abatement [J].
Baker, Erin ;
Clarke, Leon ;
Shittu, Ekundayo .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (06) :2799-2816
[8]  
BEAUMAIS O, 1995, THESIS U PARIS I PAN
[9]   Decomposing the integrated assessment of climate change [J].
Boehringer, Christoph ;
Loeschel, Andreas ;
Rutherford, Thomas F. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2007, 31 (02) :683-702
[10]   Carbon taxes with exemptions in an open economy: A general equilibrium analysis of the German tax initiative [J].
Bohringer, C ;
Rutherford, TF .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 32 (02) :189-203