Lack of kin recognition in swarming honeybees (Apis mellifera)

被引:33
作者
Kryger, P [1 ]
Moritz, RFA [1 ]
机构
[1] TECH UNIV BERLIN, INST OKOL & BIOL, D-10587 BERLIN, GERMANY
关键词
kin recognition; swarming; Apis mellifera; microsatellite DNA;
D O I
10.1007/s002650050342
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Honeybee colonies reproduce by colony fission and swarming. The primary swarm leaves the nest with the mated mother queen. Further ''after-swarms'' can leave the nest. These are composed of virgin queens and sister workers. Since all workers in the primary swarm have the same relationship to the mother queen, kin recognition cannot have any effect on the worker distribution in the swarm. Because of polyandry of the mother queen, the after-swarm is composed of super- and halfsister workers of the virgin queen. In this case kin recognition might affect swarm composition if workers increase their inclusive fitness by preferentially investing in a supersister queen. The distribution of workers in the mother colony, the primary and the after-swarm was analyzed using single-locus DNA fingerprinting in two colonies of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). The colonies were composed of 21 and 24 worker subfamilies because of multiple mating of the queen. The subfamily distribution in the mother colonies before swarming was significantly different from the subfamily frequencies in the primary swarm. This indicates different propensities for swarming in the various subfamilies. The subfamily distribution was also significantly different between the mother colony and the after-swarm. There was however no significant difference between the subfamily composition of the primary and the after-swarm. The average effects of kin recognition on the distribution of the subfamilies in the two after-swarms were less than 2%. We conclude that colony-level selection sets the evolutionary framework for swarming behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 276
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Kin recognition in honeybees [J].
Arnold, G ;
Quenet, B ;
Cornuet, JM ;
Masson, C ;
DeSchepper, B ;
Estoup, A ;
Gasqui, P .
NATURE, 1996, 379 (6565) :498-498
[2]   DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN AND WITHIN COLONIES OF SOCIAL INSECTS - 2 NULL HYPOTHESES [J].
CARLIN, NF .
NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1989, 39 (1-2) :86-100
[3]   NEPOTISM IN THE HONEY-BEE [J].
CARLIN, NF ;
FRUMHOFF, PC .
NATURE, 1990, 346 (6286) :706-707
[4]   PRECISE ASSESSMENT OF THE NUMBER OF PATRILINES AND OF GENETIC RELATEDNESS IN HONEYBEE COLONIES [J].
ESTOUP, A ;
SOLIGNAC, M ;
CORNUET, JM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1994, 258 (1351) :1-7
[5]   KIN STRUCTURE AND THE SWARMING BEHAVIOR OF THE HONEY BEE APIS-MELLIFERA [J].
GETZ, WM ;
BRUCKNER, D ;
PARISIAN, TR .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1982, 10 (04) :265-270
[6]  
GETZ WM, 1991, ETHOLOGY, V87, P298
[7]  
GETZ WM, 1991, KIN RECOGNITION
[8]   EVIDENCE FROM MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA THAT AFRICAN HONEY BEES SPREAD AS CONTINUOUS MATERNAL LINEAGES [J].
HALL, HG ;
MURALIDHARAN, K .
NATURE, 1989, 339 (6221) :211-213
[9]   GENETICAL EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR 2 [J].
HAMILTON, WD .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1964, 7 (01) :17-&
[10]  
LAIDLAW HH, 1984, GENETICS, V108, P985