Risk of recurrence after treatment of early breast cancer with skin-sparing mastectomy

被引:142
作者
Kroll, SS [1 ]
Schusterman, MA [1 ]
Tadjalli, HE [1 ]
Singletary, SE [1 ]
Ames, FC [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,MD ANDERSON CANC CTR,DEPT SURG ONCOL,HOUSTON,TX 77030
关键词
breast cancer; skin-sparing mastectomy;
D O I
10.1007/BF02306609
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Skin-sparing mastectomy, combined with immediate breast reconstruction, has become increasingly popular. However, there are no published long-term data to support its oncologic safety. Our purpose was to evaluate the long-term oncologic risk of skin-sparing mastectomy. Methods: The records of all patients who had undergone treatment of T1 or T2 breast cancer by mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction, and who were followed for at least 5 years or developed recurrence of disease before that time were reviewed. Local and distant recurrence rates observed in patients treated by skin-sparing mastectomy were compared with those in patients treated by conventional, non-skin-sparing mastectomy. Results: A total of 104 patients were treated with skin-sparing mastectomies. In that group, 6.7%, developed local recurrences, 12.5% developed distant metastases, 88.5% remained free of disease, and 7.7% died of their disease. Among the 27 patients who did not have skin-sparing mastectomies, 7.4% had local recurrences, 25.9% had distant metastases, 74.1% remained free of disease, and 18.5% died of disease. These recurrence rates are similar to those reported elsewhere after treatment with conventional mastectomy and without reconstruction. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that skin-sparing mastectomy does not significantly increase the risk of local or systemic disease recurrence in patients with early breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 197
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   PROGNOSIS IN BREAST-CANCER UTILIZING HISTOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PRIMARY TUMOR [J].
BLACK, MM ;
BARCLAY, THC ;
HANKEY, BF .
CANCER, 1975, 36 (06) :2048-2055
[2]  
BRUCE J, 1970, LANCET, P433
[3]   VARIOUS METHODS OF BREAST RECONSTRUCTION AFTER MASTECTOMY - AN ECONOMIC COMPARISON [J].
ELKOWITZ, A ;
COLEN, S ;
SLAVIN, S ;
SEIBERT, J ;
WEINSTEIN, M ;
SHAW, W .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 92 (01) :77-83
[4]   10-YEAR RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING RADICAL MASTECTOMY AND TOTAL MASTECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT RADIATION [J].
FISHER, B ;
REDMOND, C ;
FISHER, ER ;
BAUER, M ;
WOLMARK, N ;
WICKERHAM, DL ;
DEUTSCH, M ;
MONTAGUE, E ;
MARGOLESE, R ;
FOSTER, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (11) :674-681
[5]  
GEORGIADE GS, 1985, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V76, P415, DOI 10.1097/00006534-198509000-00014
[6]  
HAFFTY BG, 1989, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V124, P1266
[7]  
JOHNSON CH, 1989, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V124, P819
[8]  
KROLL SS, 1991, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V172, P17
[9]   A COMPARISON OF FACTORS AFFECTING AESTHETIC OUTCOMES OF TRAM FLAP BREAST RECONSTRUCTIONS [J].
KROLL, SS ;
COFFEY, JA ;
WINN, RJ ;
SCHUSTERMAN, MA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1995, 96 (04) :860-864
[10]  
SARRAZIN D, 1984, CANCER, V53, P1209, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19840301)53:5<1209::AID-CNCR2820530531>3.0.CO