Dual criteria decisions

被引:12
作者
Andersen, Steffen [1 ]
Harrison, Glenn W. [2 ,3 ]
Lau, Morten Igel [1 ,4 ]
Rutstroem, Elisabet E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Econ, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Georgia State Univ, Dept Risk Management & Insurance, Robinson Coll Business, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Georgia State Univ, Ctr Econ Anal Risk, Robinson Coll Business, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[4] Univ Durham, Sch Business, Durham DH1 3HP, England
[5] Georgia State Univ, Robinson Coll Business, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Risk; Multiple criteria; Individual decision making; Natural experiment; PROSPECT-THEORY; UTILITY-THEORY; RISK ATTITUDES; CHOICE; NEUROECONOMICS; PREFERENCES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.joep.2013.02.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The most popular models of decision making use a single criterion to evaluate projects or lotteries. However, decision makers may actually consider multiple criteria when evaluating projects. We consider a dual criteria model from psychology. This model integrates the familiar tradeoffs between risk and utility that economists traditionally assume, allowance for rank-dependent decision weights, and consideration of income thresholds. We examine the issues involved in full maximum likelihood estimation of the model using observed choice data. We propose a general method for integrating the multiple criteria, using the logic of mixture models, which we believe is attractive from a decision-theoretic and statistical perspective. The model is applied to observed choices from a major natural experiment involving intrinsically dynamic choices over highly skewed outcomes. The evidence points to the clear role that income thresholds play in such decision making, but does not rule out a role for tradeoffs between risk and utility or probability weighting. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 113
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Andersen S., 2011, 201104 GEORG STAT U
[2]  
Andersen S., 2008, RES EXP ECON, V12
[3]   Eliciting risk and time preferences [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
ECONOMETRICA, 2008, 76 (03) :583-618
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1979, EXPECTED UTILITY HYP, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-7629-1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The econometrics of financial markets, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400830213
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Continuous Univariate Distributions
[7]   AN EXPECTED GAIN-CONFIDENCE LIMIT CRITERION FOR PORTFOLIO SELECTION [J].
BAUMOL, WJ .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1963, 10 (01) :174-182
[8]   RISK, RETURN, AND UTILITY [J].
BELL, DE .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (01) :23-30
[9]   Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption-saving decisions [J].
Benhabib, J ;
Bisin, A .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2005, 52 (02) :460-492
[10]   RISK AVERSION AND EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY: AN EXPERIMENT WITH LARGE AND SMALL STAKES [J].
Bombardini, Matilde ;
Trebbi, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2012, 10 (06) :1348-1399