A comparison of the incidence of the oculocardiac and oculorespiratory reflexes during sevoflurane or halothane anesthesia for strabismus surgery in children

被引:56
作者
Allison, CE
De Lange, JJ
Koole, FD
Zuurmond, WWA
Ros, HH
van Schagen, NT
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Acad Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, NL-1018 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Acad Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, NL-1018 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-200002000-00012
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
We examined changes in the cardiorespiratory system of small children during surgical correction of strabismus with a laryngeal mask airway and spontaneous respiration with sevoflurane or halothane inhaled anesthesia. Fifty-one children, 1-7 yr old, having outpatient strabismus correction were randomized to sevoflurane (S) or halothane (H) in 66% nitrous oxide at 1.3 minimum alveolar concentration. Children breathed spontaneously through a laryngeal mask airway and were not pretreated with anticholinergics. The oculocardiac reflex (OCR), defined as a 20% decrease in heart rate (HR) from baseline, dysrhythmias, or sinoatrial arrest concomitant with ocular muscle traction occurred less frequently with sevoflurane than with halothane (S: 38%, H:79%, P = 0.009). The baseline HR was higher with sevoflurane (S: 114 +/- 13 bpm, H: 101 +/- 15 bpm, P = 0.002). The lowest WR occurred with halothane (S: 95 +/- 22 bpm, H: 73 +/- 19 bpm, P = 0.001). The incidence of dysrhythmias was higher in the halothane group (S: 4%, H: 42%, P = 0.004). Reductions in minute ventilation and PETCO2 accompanied OCRs. Airway irritability was present with halothane only (S: 0, H: 3). Eleven children, of whom the majority had received halothane, required measures to correct Spo(2-) < 95% or PETCO2 > 60 mm Hg during maintenance anesthesia (S: 11%, H: 32%). Sevoflurane may be a more suitable anesthetic than halothane for operations involving traction on the ocular muscles with spontaneous respiration in children because of reduced incidence of OCR, airway irritability, and ventilatory disturbances. Implications: Some children experience a sudden slowing of the heart and impaired breathing when the surgeon pulls on the eye muscles during squint operations under anesthesia. Sevoflurane, a recently developed anesthetic vapor, may reduce this problem when compared with the established vapor halothane.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 310
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
THE OCULORESPIRATORY REFLEX REVISITED [J].
BLANC, VF ;
JACOB, JL ;
MILOT, J ;
CYRENNE, L .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1988, 35 (05) :468-472
[2]
A comparison of the respiratory effects of sevoflurane and halothane in infants and young children [J].
Brown, K ;
Aun, C ;
Stocks, J ;
Jackson, E ;
Mackersie, A ;
Hatch, D .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (01) :86-92
[3]
Anaesthesia for strabismus surgery: a regional survey [J].
Dell, R ;
Williams, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (05) :761-763
[4]
DOI M, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P241
[5]
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AGE AND HALOTHANE REQUIREMENT IN MAN [J].
GREGORY, GA ;
EGER, EI ;
MUNSON, ES .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1969, 30 (05) :488-&
[6]
Sevoflurane depresses myocardial contractility less than halothane during induction of anesthesia in children [J].
Holzman, RS ;
vanderVelde, ME ;
Kaus, SJ ;
Body, SC ;
Colan, SD ;
Sullivan, LJ ;
Soriano, SG .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (06) :1260-1267
[7]
IGNAGAKI Y, 1997, ANESTH ANALG, V84, pS434
[8]
SEVOFLURANE FOR ENT-SURGERY IN CHILDREN - A COMPARISON WITH HALOTHANE [J].
JOHANNESSON, GP ;
FLOREN, M ;
LINDAHL, SGE .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 39 (04) :546-550
[9]
COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES INDUCED BY SEVOFLURANE AND HALOTHANE IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS [J].
KAWANA, S ;
WACHI, J ;
NAKAYAMA, M ;
NAMIKI, A .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (07) :603-607
[10]
Spontaneous breathing with the use of a laryngeal mask airway in children: Comparison of sevoflurane and isoflurane [J].
Komatsu, H ;
Chujo, K ;
Morita, J ;
Ogawa, N ;
Ueki, M ;
Yokono, S ;
Ogli, K .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 7 (02) :111-115