Elective endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Systematic review of short-term results

被引:93
作者
Adriaensen, MEAPM
Bosch, JL
Halpern, EF
Hunink, MGM
Gazelle, GS
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
aneurysm; abdominal; aortic; surgery; data; analysis; grafts; interventional procedures;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2243011675
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To summarize and compare published short-term results of elective endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Materials and Methods: A MEDLINE search of the English literature was performed. Studies with at least 10 patients in each treatment group were included if they reported patient characteristics, complications, and mortality. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. A random-effects model was used to pool the data and calculate pooled odds ratios (endovascular vs open surgical repair). Results: Nine studies were included, reported results of 1.318 procedures (687 endovascular repair and 631 open surgical repair). Mean blood loss was 456 mL for endovascular repair and 1,202 mL for open surgical repair (P=.003). On average, patients undergoing endovascular repair spent 0.5 days in the intensive care unit and 3.9 days in the hospital, and patients undergoing open surgical repair spent 2.2 days (P=.04) in the intensive care unit and 10.3 days (P=.02) in the hospital. The pooled 30-day-mortality was 0.03 for endovascular repair (95% CI: 0.02, 0.04) and 0.04 for open surgical repair (95% CI: 0.00, 0.07) (P=.03), and the odds ratio was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.92). The pooled local and/or vascular complication rate was 0.16 for endovascular repair (95% CI: 0.06, 0.25) and 0.12 for open surgical repair (95% CI: 0.06, 0.18)(P=.46), and the odds ratio was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.54). The pooled systemic and/or remote complication rate was 0.17 for endovascular repair (95% CI: 0.09, 0.25) and 0.44 for open surgical repair (95% CI: 0.21, 0.66) (P<.001), and the odds ratio was 0.22 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.45). Conclusion: On the basis of this systematic review, endovascular repair results in less blood loss, shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, lower 30-day mortality, and lower systemic and/or remote complication rates than those of open surgical repair. (C) RSNA, 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 747
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] REPORTING STANDARDS FOR LOWER-EXTREMITY ARTERIAL ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES
    AHN, SS
    RUTHERFORD, RB
    BECKER, GJ
    COMEROTA, AJ
    JOHNSTON, KW
    MCCLEAN, GK
    SEEGER, JM
    STRING, ST
    WHITE, RA
    WHITTEMORE, AD
    ZARINS, CK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1993, 17 (06) : 1103 - 1107
  • [2] Reporting standards for infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Ahn, SS
    Rutherford, RB
    Johnston, KW
    May, J
    Veith, FJ
    Baker, JD
    Ernst, CB
    Moore, WS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 25 (02) : 405 - 410
  • [3] Complications of standard elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Akkersdijk, GJM
    van der Graaf, Y
    Moll, FL
    de Vries, AC
    Kitslaar, PJEHM
    van Bockel, JH
    Hak, E
    Eikelboom, BC
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 15 (06) : 505 - 510
  • [4] Mid-term results of endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients anatomically suitable for endovascular repair
    Becquemin, JP
    Bourriez, A
    D'Audiffret, A
    Zubilewicz, T
    Kobeiter, H
    Allaire, E
    Mellière, D
    Desgranges, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 19 (06) : 656 - 661
  • [5] Mid-term results of a second generation bifurcated endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: The French Vanguard trial
    Becquemin, JP
    Lapie, V
    Favre, JP
    Rousseau, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 30 (02) : 209 - 218
  • [6] PUBLICATION BIAS - A PROBLEM IN INTERPRETING MEDICAL DATA
    BEGG, CB
    BERLIN, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1988, 151 : 419 - 463
  • [7] Cost of endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Birch, SE
    Stary, DR
    Scott, AR
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 70 (09): : 660 - 666
  • [8] Initial experience with endovascular aneurysm repair: Comparison of early results with outcome of conventional open repair
    Brewster, DC
    Geller, SC
    Kaufman, JA
    Cambria, RP
    Gertler, JP
    LaMuraglia, GM
    Atamian, S
    Abbott, WM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 27 (06) : 992 - 1003
  • [9] Early complications and endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Report of a multicenter study - Discussion
    Parodi, JC
    Buth, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 31 (01) : 145 - 146
  • [10] Ceelen W, 1999, ACTA CHIR BELG, V99, P64