The centralization phenomenon of spinal symptoms - a systematic review

被引:113
作者
Aina, A
May, S
Clare, H
机构
[1] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sheffield S10 2BP, S Yorkshire, England
[2] DTM, Studio Riabilitaz, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.math.2004.03.004
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The centralization phenomenon was first described 20 years ago. It refers to the abolition of distal pain emanating from the spine in response to therapeutic exercises. Since then a number of papers on the subject have been published. A review of current knowledge is appropriate. Selection criteria were established prior to a computer-aided search for published papers. Two reviewers independently extracted data and checked quality; a third reviewer resolved any disagreements. A narrative review was conducted based on the findings. The review primarily considered prevalence, reliability of assessment, and prognostic significance. These have been most commonly reported, and are important to establish the clinical worth of this symptom response. Fourteen studies were identified. Quality of studies varied; prognostic studies were given a mean score of 3.3 out of 6 by using established quality criteria. The prevalence rate of pure or partial centralization was 70% in 731 sub-acute back patients, and 52% in 325 chronic back patients. It is a symptom response that can be reliably assessed during examination (kappa values 0.51-1.0). Centralization was consistently associated with a range of good outcomes, and failure to centralize with a poor outcome. Centralization appears to identify a substantial sub-group of spinal patients; it is a clinical phenomenon that can be reliably detected, and is associated with a good prognosis. Centralization should be monitored in the examination of spinal patients. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 143
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Abbott JH, 2002, NZ J PHYSIOTHER, V30, P8
[2]  
Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR), 1994, ACUTE LOW BACK PROBL
[3]  
Altman D, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P404
[4]   Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables [J].
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7306) :224-228
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Physiotherapy
[6]  
BINKLEY J, 1995, PHYS THER, V75, P786, DOI 10.1093/ptj/75.9.786
[7]   A report from the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain - Reexamining priorities [J].
Borkan, JM ;
Koes, B ;
Reis, S ;
Cherkin, DC .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :1992-1996
[8]   PSYCHOSOCIAL PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME IN ACUTE AND SUBCHRONIC LOW-BACK TROUBLE [J].
BURTON, AK ;
TILLOTSON, KM ;
MAIN, CJ ;
HOLLIS, S .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (06) :722-728
[9]  
CHAVANNES AW, 1986, J ROY COLL GEN PRACT, V36, P271
[10]   PHYSICIAN VARIATION IN DIAGNOSTIC TESTING FOR LOW-BACK-PAIN - WHO YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET [J].
CHERKIN, DC ;
DEYO, RA ;
WHEELER, K ;
CIOL, MA .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1994, 37 (01) :15-22