Modelling the effect of pore structure and wetting angles on capillary rise in soils having different wettabilities

被引:54
作者
Czachor, Henryk [1 ]
机构
[1] PAS, Inst Agrophys, PL-20290 Lublin, Poland
关键词
capillary rise; pore waviness; contact angle; soil repellency;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.01.003
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Capillary rise in axis symmetrical sinusoidal capillary (SC) has been modelled. Analytical formula for meniscus radius, capillary pressure and meniscus rate in SC have been found. Capillary shape described by watt waviness highly influences all of them. The limit between wettability and repellency in such capillary is described by critical value of contact angle theta(C) which is related to the pore geometry by the equation ctg(theta(c)) = pi d(2), where d(2) - pore watt waviness. Kinetics of capillary rise in sinusoidal capillary has been determined by numerical integration of meniscus rate equation for a wide range of pore watt waviness and several values of contact angles. Application of Washburn theory to the data obtained from simulation gives the contact angle value much higher than the true one. In contrast, the obtained pore radius value is usually well correlated with capillary neck. However, in some cases a calculated radius can be even smaller. Above conclusions have been qualitatively confirmed by experiments performed on glass beads and soils. Contact angle measured on flat glass was 27.4 degrees. The calculations concerning the data from capillary rise experiments on 90-1000 mu m fraction of glass powder and Washburn theory gave values ca. 80 degrees. The contact angle values for peat soils and loamy sand have close values, which supports the opinion that non-cylindrical shape of soil pores highly influences both the wettability/repellency and the water flux in soils. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 613
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Development and application of a new sessile drop contact angle method to assess soil water repellency [J].
Bachmann, J ;
Ellies, A ;
Hartge, KH .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 231 :66-75
[2]   Physics of water repellent soils [J].
Bauters, TWJ ;
Steenhuis, TS ;
DiCarlo, DA ;
Nieber, JL ;
Dekker, LW ;
Ritsema, CJ ;
Parlange, JY ;
Haverkamp, R .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 231 :233-243
[3]   TENSIOMETRIC STUDIES ON WETTING .1. SOME EFFECTS OF SURFACE-ROUGHNESS (THEORETICAL) [J].
BAYRAMLI, E ;
VANDEVEN, TGM ;
MASON, SG .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE CHIMIE, 1981, 59 (13) :1954-1961
[4]   Water repellency in sandy luvisols under different forest transformation stages in northeast Germany [J].
Buczko, U ;
Bens, O ;
Fischer, H ;
Hüttl, RF .
GEODERMA, 2002, 109 (1-2) :1-18
[5]   Problems of contact angle and solid surface free energy determination [J].
Chibowski, E ;
Perea-Carpio, R .
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2002, 98 (02) :245-264
[6]  
Cho KJ, 1998, FLUID DYN RES, V23, P349, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5983(98)00003-3
[7]  
CZACHOR H, 1986, ZESZ PROBL POST NAUK, V312, P91
[8]  
CZACHOR H, 1997, ACTA AGROPHYSICA, V7, P3
[9]  
Czachor HM, 2001, T ASAE, V44, P439, DOI 10.13031/2013.4672
[10]   Water repellency in soils: a historical overview [J].
DeBano, LF .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 231 :4-32