Surveillance strategies and populations at risk: Biopolitical governance in Canada's national security policy

被引:27
作者
Bell, Colleen [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Ctr Int & Secur Studies, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
关键词
biopolitics; surveillance; 'war on terror'; racism; Canada;
D O I
10.1177/0967010606066168
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
This article examines how Canada's new national security policy operates through language and practices that take elusive risks to the health and safety of the population as an opportunity for action, and is made possible through an expansion of surveillance. The biopolitical character of security has greatly reduced the traditional distinction between the state as a military apparatus and the state as a service provider and manager of the citizenry. The article argues that the biopolitical governance strategies of Canada's national security policy treat the problems for political freedom, equality and democratic accountability posed by encroaching security measures as largely negligible in the face of indeterminable danger. Using a Foucauldian analysis, the article establishes the connection between biopolitics and security. It subsequently examines how the Canadian policy deploys truth claims about the immanence of 'threat' and how claims about Canadian values produce an internal 'other' that represents the proliferation of threats. The article then focuses on two principle techniques of governance: first, guarding the freedom, health and safety of the population, and, second, expanding surveillance to give national security a totalizing reach. The article concludes by theorizing the implications of security governance for legitimating racial profiling and the 'war on terror'.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 165
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Journal of International Relations and Development, DOI DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.JIRD.1800018
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, THEORY EVENT
[3]  
Baudrillard J., 2002, The spirit of terrorism
[4]  
Bauman Zygmunt., 1989, MODERNITY HOLOCAUST
[5]  
Bigo Didier, 2005, LIBERTY WHOSE LIBERT
[6]  
Campbell David., 1998, WRITING SECURITY US
[7]  
*COMM SEC EST CAN, 2004, COMM SEC EST NAT CRY
[8]   Sovereignty and governmentality: From the problematics of the ''new world order'' to the ethical problematic of the world order [J].
Dillon, M .
ALTERNATIVES-SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION AND HUMANE GOVERNANCE, 1995, 20 (03) :323-368
[9]   Global liberal governance: Biopolitics, security and war [J].
Dillon, M ;
Reid, J .
MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 2001, 30 (01) :41-+
[10]  
Dillon M. G., 2004, GLOBAL GOVT GOVERNIN, P76