Interinstitutional variations of sensitometric curves of radiographic dosimetric films

被引:16
作者
Bos, LJ
Danciu, C
Cheng, CW
Brugmans, MJP
van der Horst, A
Minken, A
Mijnheer, BJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Patras, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med, GR-26110 Patras, Greece
[3] Univ Arizona, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
film dosimetry; sensitometric curve; photon beam dosimetry;
D O I
10.1118/1.1494833
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Depth and field size dependence of the sensitometric curves of radiographic films have been studied by various groups. Limited information is, however, available on the magnitude of the variations in sensitometric curves applied in clinical practice in different institutions. In this study we assessed in a systematic way the effect of the various parameters influencing the shape of the sensitometric curve: batch composition, irradiation conditions, film processing, and film scanning. Two types of film, Kodak X-Omat V and CEA TVS, were irradiated, processed, and analyzed in three different institutions. The interinstitutional variation of the sensitometric curves, expressed as the OD variation at 50 cGy, can be up to 32% and is mainly caused by differences in film processing and to a lesser degree to differences in batch composition, film scanning, and irradiation conditions. For the Kodak films, the average OD difference at 50 cGy between the three institutions is 17% as a result of differences in batch composition and 25% due to differences in processing conditions. For the CEA films these data are 6% and 24%, respectively. The long-term variation of the sensitometric curves of KODAK films in one institution was smaller than the differences in batch composition between the three institutions. The sensitometric curves of CEA films showed in one institution a large variation with time; the shape gradually varied from sigmoidal to quasilinear. By using relative OD values rather than absolute OD values, variations in sensitometric curves of KODAK films can be reduced to 2%. Consequently, one sensitometric curve is sufficient to derive relative dose values. If processing conditions are well controlled, it might therefore be advantageous to determine the absolute OD only at one or two dose values, in combination with a "universal" relative sensitometric curve. (C) 2002 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1772 / 1780
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A new approach to film dosimetry for high energy photon beams: Lateral scatter filtering [J].
Burch, SE ;
Kearfott, KJ ;
Trueblood, JH ;
Sheils, WC ;
Yeo, JI ;
Wang, CKC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (05) :775-783
[2]   Use of CEA TVS film for measuring high energy photon beam dose distributions [J].
Cadman, P .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (08) :1435-1437
[3]   Dosimetry of high energy photon and electron beams with CEA films [J].
Cheng, CW ;
Das, IJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (07) :1225-1232
[4]   Variation of sensitometric curves of radiographic films in high energy photon beams [J].
Danciu, C ;
Proimos, BS ;
Rosenwald, JC ;
Mijnheer, BJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (06) :966-974
[5]  
DUTREIX J, 1996, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V161, P33
[6]   AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT DOSIMETRIC METHODS OF MEASURING PROFILES AND DEPTH DOSES FOR DYNAMIC WEDGES ON A VARIAN 600C LINEAR-ACCELERATOR [J].
ELDER, PJ ;
COVENEY, FM ;
WELSH, AD .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1995, 40 (04) :683-689
[7]   Dosimetric evaluation of the conformation of the multileaf collimator to irregularly shaped fields [J].
Frazier, A ;
Du, M ;
Wong, J ;
Vicini, F ;
Taylor, R ;
Yu, C ;
Matter, R ;
Martinez, A ;
Yan, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (05) :1229-1238
[8]   EVALUATION OF MULTILEAF COLLIMATOR DESIGN FOR A PHOTON-BEAM [J].
GALVIN, JM ;
SMITH, AR ;
MOELLER, RD ;
GOODMAN, RL ;
POWLIS, WD ;
RUBENSTEIN, J ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
MICHAEL, B ;
NEEDHAM, M ;
HUNTZINGER, CJ ;
KLIGERMAN, MM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1992, 23 (04) :789-801
[9]  
Hale J I, 1994, Med Dosim, V19, P43
[10]  
Haus AG, 1997, BASICS FILM PROCESSI