Experienced disgust causes a negative interpretation bias: A causal role for disgust in anxious psychopathology

被引:55
作者
Davey, Graham C. L. [1 ]
Bickerstaffe, Sarah [1 ]
MacDonald, Beme A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Dept Psychol, Brighton BN1 9QH, E Sussex, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
disgust; anxiety; mood inductions; information-processing bias; threat interpretation; anxious psychopathology;
D O I
10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.006
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This paper reports the results of an experiment investigating the effect of induced disgust on interpretational bias using the homophone spelling task. Four groups of participants experienced a disgust, anxiety, happy or neutral mood induction and then completed the homophone spelling task which requires the participant to interpret ambiguous words presented through headphones. Both the disgust and anxiety groups interpreted significantly more threat/neutral homophones as threat than both the happy and neutral groups; the disgust group also interpreted significantly fewer positive/neutral homophones as positive than the happy group. These findings are consistent with the view that induced disgust causes a negative interpretational bias which is similar to that reported for anxiety. The results could not be interpreted in terms of the disgust induction concurrently raising levels of self-reported anxiety, but could be interpreted in terms of disgust maintaining existing levels of anxiety. The effect of disgust was to facilitate negative interpretations rather than emotional interpretations regardless of valence. These findings provide the basis for a causal role for disgust in anxious psychopathology. Because the effect is a non-specific emotion-congruent one, elevated disgust levels will result in a predisposition to interpret information in a threatening way across a broad range of anxious- and threat-relevant domains. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1375 / 1384
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Basic emotions evoked by odorants: Comparison between autonomic responses and self-evaluation [J].
AlaouiIsmaili, O ;
Robin, O ;
Rada, H ;
Dittmar, A ;
VernetMaury, E .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1997, 62 (04) :713-720
[2]   Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguous information: Beyond the emotion-congruent effect [J].
Blanchette, I ;
Richards, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2003, 132 (02) :294-309
[3]   Covert and overt orienting of attention to emotional faces in anxiety [J].
Bradley, BP ;
Mogg, K ;
Millar, NH .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2000, 14 (06) :789-808
[4]   Attentional bias for emotional faces in generalized anxiety disorder [J].
Bradley, BP ;
Hogg, K ;
White, J ;
Groom, C ;
de Bono, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 38 :267-278
[5]  
CAVANAGH K, 2000, BPS ANN C WINCH UK
[6]   Attention bias for disgust [J].
Charash, M ;
McKay, D .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2002, 16 (05) :529-541
[7]  
Davey G, 2003, PSYCHOLOGIST, V16, P412
[8]   SELF-REPORTED FEARS TO COMMON INDIGENOUS ANIMALS IN AN ADULT UK POPULATION - THE OF DISGUST SENSITIVITY [J].
DAVEY, GCL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 85 :541-554
[9]  
Davey GCL, 1998, EUR EAT DISORD REV, V6, P201, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0968(199809)6:3<201::AID-ERV224>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-E