A Typology of Catalyst Events for Collaborative Watershed Management in the United States

被引:35
作者
Prokopy, Linda Stalker [1 ]
Mullendore, Nathan [1 ]
Brasier, Kathryn [2 ]
Floress, Kristin [3 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Forestry & Nat Resources, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr Econ Sociol & Educ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Coll Nat Resources, Stevens Point, WI 54481 USA
关键词
trigger events; watershed management; non-point-source pollution; focusing events; catalyst events; collaboration; water quality; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT; RESOURCE MOBILIZATION; SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION; SCIENCE; STAKEHOLDERS; PARTNERSHIPS; COOPERATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/08941920.2014.918230
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
While much has been written about the benefits of collaborative watershed management to address nonpoint source pollution and other water quality concerns in the United States, few scholars have addressed the catalytic nature of events that generate these collective action responses. Further, because equivalent catalyst events in different communities do not always lead to collective action, it is critical to understand the interaction between a community's baseline conditions and the catalyst events that lead to collective action. This article presents a conceptual framework that illustrates the relationship between baseline conditions and events that lead to collective action. In this article a theoretical typology of catalyst events is presented that includes both intentional and nonintentional types of events. Understanding these types of catalyst events can help water quality advocates create and/or seize opportunities to nurture a collective action. This article concludes with a call for future research into catalyst events.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1191
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Baumgartner FrankR., 2009, Chicago studies in American politics, Vsecond
[2]   Evaluation of a collaborative model: A case study analysis of watershed planning in the intermountain west [J].
Bentrup, G .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (05) :739-748
[3]  
Birkland T.A., 1997, DISASTER AGENDA SETT
[4]  
Born S.M., 2000, The Watershed Approach: An Empirical Assessment of Innovation in Environmental Management
[5]   The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature [J].
Bryson, John M. ;
Crosby, Barbara C. ;
Stone, Melissa Middleton .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 :44-55
[6]   Does Collaboration Promote Grass-Roots Behavior Change? Farmer Adoption of Best Management Practices in Two Watersheds [J].
Campbell, Joseph T. ;
Koontz, Tomas M. ;
Bonnell, Joseph E. .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2011, 24 (11) :1127-1141
[7]   Watersheds are not equal: Exploring the feasibility of watershed management [J].
Chess, C ;
Gibson, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2001, 37 (04) :775-782
[8]   Cooperative modeling: Building bridges between science and the public [J].
Cockerill, K ;
Passell, H ;
Tidwell, V .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2006, 42 (02) :457-471
[9]   An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social-ecological research [J].
Collins, Scott L. ;
Carpenter, Stephen R. ;
Swinton, Scott M. ;
Orenstein, Daniel E. ;
Childers, Daniel L. ;
Gragson, Ted L. ;
Grimm, Nancy B. ;
Grove, Morgan ;
Harlan, Sharon L. ;
Kaye, Jason P. ;
Knapp, Alan K. ;
Kofinas, Gary P. ;
Magnuson, John J. ;
McDowell, William H. ;
Melack, John M. ;
Ogden, Laura A. ;
Robertson, G. Philip ;
Smith, Melinda D. ;
Whitmer, Ali C. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 9 (06) :351-357
[10]   TYPOLOGIES AS A UNIQUE FORM OF THEORY BUILDING - TOWARD IMPROVED UNDERSTANDING AND MODELING [J].
DOTY, DH ;
GLICK, WH .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (02) :230-251