Evaluation of VIE and PIT tagging methods for juvenile cyprinid fishes

被引:56
作者
Bolland, J. D. [1 ,2 ]
Cowx, I. G. [1 ]
Lucas, M. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull Int, Inst Fisheries, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[2] Univ Durham, Sch Biol & Biomed Sci, Durham, England
关键词
VISIBLE IMPLANT ELASTOMER; FLUORESCENT ELASTOMER; BROWN TROUT; DUMMY TRANSMITTERS; TAG RETENTION; MARKING; GROWTH; TECHNOLOGY; SURVIVAL; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01261.x
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
P>Retention and mortality associated with visible implant elastomer (VIE) and passive integrated transponder (PIT) tagged juvenile chub [Leuciscus cephalus (L.)], dace [Leuciscus leuciscus (L.)] and roach [Rutilus rutilus (L.)] were evaluated. PIT tag retention (96.6-100%) was higher than VIE over the 6-month duration of the experiment. VIE retention was significantly better in the head (96.3-98.8%) than in the fins (78.8-90.9%) the first month after tagging, but the opposite was found after 6 months (head = 21.5-57.5%; fins = 77.2-88.8%). Survival was not significantly different from controls for any treatment, except dace tagged with 23-mm PIT (significantly influenced by mass of fish at tagging) and sham PIT tagged dace, because of initial losses. PIT tags are recommended as the most suitable method for tagging individual juvenile chub, dace and roach based on high retention and survival. VIE implantation in the head (studies < 30 days) and fins (studies > 30 days) could provide a cheap, batch-marking alternative, provided retention rates are monitored.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 386
页数:6
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Laboratory experiment on survival, growth and tag retention following PIT injection into the body cavity of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) [J].
Acolas, M. L. ;
Roussel, J. M. ;
Lebel, J. M. ;
Bagliniere, J. L. .
FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2007, 86 (2-3) :280-284
[2]   PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF SWIMBLADDER FUNCTION [J].
ALEXANDER, RM .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1966, 41 (01) :141-+
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, A brief discussion on the 2% tag/body weight rule of thumb
[4]  
Bailey R. E., 1998, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V18, P191, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(1998)018<0191:EOVIFT>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   The effect of PIT tags on growth and physiology of age-0 cultured Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis of variable size [J].
Baras, E ;
Malbrouck, C ;
Houbart, M ;
Kestemont, P ;
Mélard, C .
AQUACULTURE, 2000, 185 (1-2) :159-173
[7]  
Bonneau Joseph L., 1995, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V15, P563, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(1995)015<0563:CMAEOJ>2.3.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   An evaluation of coded wire and elastomer tag performance in juvenile common snook under field and laboratory conditions [J].
Brennan, NP ;
Leber, KM ;
Blankenship, HL ;
Ransier, JM ;
DeBruler, R .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, 2005, 25 (02) :437-445
[10]  
Brown Richard S., 1999, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V19, P867, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(1999)019<0867:ETCTRF>2.0.CO