Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests

被引:374
作者
Lijmer, JG
Bossuyt, PMM
Heisterkamp, SH
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Dept RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands
关键词
diagnostic tests; diagnostic accuracy; meta-analysis; systematic review;
D O I
10.1002/sim.1185
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
It is indispensable for any meta-analysis that potential sources of heterogeneity are examined, before one considers pooling the results of primary studies into summary estimates with enhanced precision. In reviews of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of tests, variability beyond chance can be attributed to between-study differences in the selected cutpoint for positivity, in patient selection and clinical setting, in the type of test used, in the type of reference standard, or any combination of these factors. In addition, heterogeneity in Study results can also be caused by flaws in study design. This paper critically examines some of the potential reasons for heterogeneity and the methods to explore them. Empirical support for the existence of different sources of variation is reviewed. Incorporation of sources of variability explicitly into systematic reviews on diagnostic accuracy is demonstrated with data From a recent review. Application of regression techniques in meta-analysis of diagnostic tests can provide relevant additional information. Results of such analyses will help understand problems with the transferability of diagnostic tests and to point out flaws in primary studies. As such, they can guide the design of future studies. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1525 / 1537
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   D-Dimer testing and acute venous thromboembolism - A shortcut to accurate diagnosis? [J].
Becker, DM ;
Philbrick, JT ;
Bachhuber, TL ;
Humphries, JE .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (09) :939-946
[2]   Measuring the quality of trials - The quality of quality scales [J].
Berlin, JA ;
Rennie, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (11) :1083-1085
[3]  
Bruns DE, 2000, CLIN CHEM, V46, P893
[4]   The role of clinical suspicion in evaluating a new diagnostic test for active tuberculosis - Results of a multicenter prospective trial [J].
Catanzaro, A ;
Perry, S ;
Clarridge, JE ;
Dunbar, S ;
Goodnight-White, S ;
LoBue, PA ;
Peter, C ;
Pfyffer, GE ;
Sierra, MF ;
Weber, R ;
Woods, G ;
Mathews, G ;
Jonas, V ;
Smith, K ;
Della-Latta, P .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (05) :639-645
[5]  
*COCHR METH WORK G, 1996, SCREEN DIAGN TESTS R
[6]   THE COMBINATION OF ESTIMATES FROM DIFFERENT EXPERIMENTS [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRICS, 1954, 10 (01) :101-129
[7]   Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening [J].
Deeks, JJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7305) :157-162
[8]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[9]   Summary receiver operating characteristic curves as a technique for meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of duplex ultrasonography in peripheral arterial disease [J].
deVries, SO ;
Hunink, MGM ;
Polak, JF .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1996, 3 (04) :361-369
[10]  
Engels EA, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P1707, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20000715)19:13<1707::AID-SIM491>3.0.CO