Knowledge sharing in collaborative supply chains: twin effects of trust and power

被引:99
作者
Cai, Shun [1 ]
Goh, Mark [2 ,3 ,4 ]
de Souza, Robert [3 ]
Li, Gang [5 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Dept Management Sci, Sch Management, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Sch Business, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Logist Inst Asia Pacific, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[4] Univ S Australia, Sch Management, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[5] Samsung Econ Res Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
COMMON METHOD VARIANCE; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; TRUSTWORTHINESS; PERFORMANCE; COMMITMENT; FIRM; INTERDEPENDENCE; CAPABILITIES; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2012.701780
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Knowledge sharing has been recognised as a key enhancer of supply-chain performance. However, the sharing of knowledge may not take place easily and automatically among the supply-chain partners. This paper attempts to shed some light on the mechanisms underpinning knowledge sharing in supply chains. In particular, we focus on knowledge sharing in a dyadic buyer-supplier relationship. We posit that trust and power are two important antecedents of two types of knowledge sharing between a buyer and supplier, namely technical exchange and technology transfer. To build our research model, a large-scale mail survey was conducted from a contact list of 800 companies provided by the Singapore Logistics Association. The results of the structural equation modelling suggest that trust has significant effects on technical exchange and technology transfer. Further, power also affects technical exchange and technology transfer significantly, though the impacts appear to be weaker than trust. The theoretical and practical implications of this research are discussed. © 2013 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:2060 / 2076
页数:17
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   THE USE OF PLEDGES TO BUILD AND SUSTAIN COMMITMENT IN DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS [J].
ANDERSON, E ;
WEITZ, B .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1992, 29 (01) :18-34
[2]   A MODEL OF DISTRIBUTOR FIRM AND MANUFACTURER FIRM WORKING PARTNERSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :42-58
[3]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[4]   Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter [J].
Andrews, KM ;
Delahaye, BL .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2000, 37 (06) :797-810
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, DOI [DOI 10.17705/1CAIS.00407, 10.17705/1cais.00407]
[6]   Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others [J].
Argote, L ;
Ingram, P ;
Levine, JM ;
Moreland, RL .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 82 (01) :1-8
[7]  
Argote L., 1999, ORG LEARNING CREATIN, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1999.tb01970.x
[8]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[9]  
Arnulf Jan K., 2005, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, V8, P225, DOI DOI 10.1080/13675560500224233
[10]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1982, A second generation of multivariate analysis, P5