How does CEO tenure matter? The mediating role of firm-employee and firm-customer relationships

被引:144
作者
Luo, Xueming [1 ,2 ]
Kanuri, Vamsi K. [3 ]
Andrews, Michelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Fox Sch Business, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Fudan Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Missouri, Robert J Trulaske Sr Coll Business, Columbia, MO USA
关键词
performance volatility; CEO tenure; firm performance; employee relationships; customer relationships; MARKET ORIENTATION; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; RISK; COMPENSATION; EXPLORATION; ATTRIBUTES; LEADERSHIP; STRATEGY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1002/smj.2112
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While the direct influence of CEO tenure on firm performance has been examined in the strategy literature, the underlying channels of influence have remained largely unexplored. This article draws upon the career seasons paradigm, learning perspectives, and marketing literature to examine whether firm-employee and firm-customer relationships are the pathways through which CEO tenure influences firm performance. Results from the analysis of a large data set reveal that: (1) CEO tenure has a positive and linear association with firm-employee relationship strength but an inverted U-shaped association with firm-customer relationship strength; (2) industry uncertainty intensifies these associations; and (3) firm-employee and firm-customer relationship strength mediate the effects of CEO tenure on firm performance. These findings have implications for a more balanced and nuanced view of CEO tenure. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 511
页数:20
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Aguilar F. J., 1967, Scanning the Business Environment
[2]   Strategic responsiveness and Bowman's risk-return paradox [J].
Andersen, Torben J. ;
Denrell, Jerker ;
Bettis, Richard A. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (04) :407-429
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, BUSINESSWEEK, P21
[4]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[5]   The Red Queen, success bias, and organizational inertia [J].
Barnett, William P. ;
Pontikes, Elizabeth G. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (07) :1237-1251
[6]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[7]   Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains' acquisitions [J].
Baum, JAC ;
Li, SX ;
Usher, JM .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (04) :766-801
[8]   New anionic alkylaryl surfactants based on olefin sulfonic acids [J].
Berger, PD ;
Lee, CH .
JOURNAL OF SURFACTANTS AND DETERGENTS, 2002, 5 (01) :39-43
[9]  
Bergh DD, 2001, J MANAGE, V27, P603, DOI 10.1177/014920630102700506
[10]   Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance [J].
Berman, SL ;
Wicks, AC ;
Kotha, S ;
Jones, TM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :488-506