Extreme prematurity and parental rights after Baby Doe

被引：34

作者：

Robertson, JA ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Texas, Sch Law, Austin, TX 78712 USA

来源：

HASTINGS CENTER REPORT | 2004年 / 34卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/3528691

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

The Child Abuse Amendments of 1984 established the norms for treating disabled newborns, but they did not address the treatment of premature babies. Parents and physicians need a framework for decisionmaking. A decision handed down recently by the Texas Supreme Court is a step forward.

引用

页码：32 / 39

页数：8

共 24 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1984, PEDIATRICS, V74, P306

[2]

ARRAS JD, 1987, HASTINGS CENT REP, V17, P10

[3]

Arras JD., 1985, WHICH BABIES SHALL L, P83

[4]

BRODY J, 1991, NY TIMES 1001

[5] MORAL AND ETHICAL DILEMMAS IN SPECIAL-CARE NURSERY [J].

DUFF, RS ;

CAMPBELL, AG .

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1973, 289 (17) :890-894

[6] ETHICS COMMITTEES FOR INFANTS DOE [J].

FLEISCHMAN, AR ;

MURRAY, TH .

HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1983, 13 (06) :5-9

[7]

KOLATA G, 1991, NY TIMES 0930

[8] BABY-DOE 5 YEARS LATER - IMPLICATIONS FOR CHILD HEALTH [J].

LANTOS, J .

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 317 (07) :444-447

[9]

LORBER J, 1971, DEV MED CHILD NEUROL, V13, P279

[10] TO SAVE OR LET DIE - DILEMMA OF MODERN MEDICINE [J].

MCCORMICK, RA .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 229 (02) :172-176

← 1 2 3 →