Combining voxel intensity and cluster extent with permutation test framework

被引:221
作者
Hayasaka, S [1 ]
Nichols, TE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
permutation test; cluster size; voxel intensity;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.035
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In a massively univariate analysis of brain image data, statistical inference is typically based on intensity or spatial extent of signals. Voxel intensity-based tests provide great sensitivity for high intensity signals, whereas cluster extent-based tests are sensitive to spatially extended signals. To benefit from the strength of both, the intensity and extent information needs to be combined. Various ways of combining voxel intensity and cluster extent are possible, and a few such combining methods have been proposed. Poline et al.'s [Neurolmage 16 (1997) 831 minimum P value approach is sensitive to signals whose either intensity or extent is significant. Bullmore et al.'s [IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 18 (1999) 321 cluster mass method can detect signals whose intensity and extent are sufficiently large, even when they are not significant by intensity or extent alone. In this work, we study such combined inference methods using combining functions (Pesarin, F., 2001. Multivariate Permutation Tests. Wiley, New York) and permutation framework lHolmes et al., J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 16 (1996) 71, which allow us to examine different ways of combining voxel intensity and cluster extent information without knowing their distribution. We also attempt to calibrate combined inference by using weighted combining functions, which adjust the test according to signals of interest. Furthermore, we propose meta-combining, a combining function of combining functions, which integrates strengths of multiple combining functions into a single statistic. We found that combined tests are able to detect signals that are not detected by voxel or cluster size test alone. We also found that the weighted combining functions can calibrate the combined test according to the signals of interest, emphasizing either intensity or extent as appropriate. Though not necessarily more sensitive than individual combining functions; the meta-combining function is sensitive to all types of signals and thus can be used as a single test summarizing all the combining functions. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 63
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ADLER RJ, 1980, GEOMETRY RANDOM FIEL
[2]   Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain [J].
Bullmore, ET ;
Suckling, J ;
Overmeyer, S ;
Rabe-Hesketh, S ;
Taylor, E ;
Brammer, MJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1999, 18 (01) :32-42
[3]  
Friston K J, 1994, Hum Brain Mapp, V1, P210, DOI 10.1002/hbm.460010306
[4]   Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of inference and power [J].
Friston, KJ ;
Holmes, A ;
Poline, JB ;
Price, CJ ;
Frith, CD .
NEUROIMAGE, 1996, 4 (03) :223-235
[5]   Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods [J].
Hayasaka, S ;
Nichols, TE .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 20 (04) :2343-2356
[6]   Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments [J].
Holmes, AP ;
Blair, RC ;
Watson, JDG ;
Ford, I .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1996, 16 (01) :7-22
[7]  
HOLMES AP, 1999, P 4 INT C FUNCT MAPP, V7, pS754
[8]   Combining brains: A survey of methods for statistical pooling of information [J].
Lazar, NA ;
Luna, B ;
Sweeney, JA ;
Eddy, WF .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (02) :538-550
[9]   Order information in working memory: fMRI evidence for parietal and prefrontal mechanisms [J].
Marshuetz, C ;
Smith, EE ;
Jonides, J ;
DeGutis, J ;
Chenevert, TL .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 :130-144
[10]  
Mudholkar G. S., 1979, S OPT METH STAT, P345