Compensation through rosette formation:: the response of scarlet gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata: Polemoniaceae) to mammalian herbivory

被引:12
作者
Becklin, Katie M. [1 ]
Kirkpatrick, H. Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Puget Sound, Dept Biol, Tacoma, WA 98416 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE | 2006年 / 84卷 / 08期
关键词
compensation; fecundity; plant-herbivore interactions; regrowth; ancillary rosettes;
D O I
10.1139/B06-099
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Plants could potentially compensate for floral herbivory by regrowing flowering stalks and by forming additional vegetative stems. Because scarlet gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata (Pursh) V. Grant) is described as monocarpic, its ability to regrow multiple flowering stalks following the removal of its primary inflorescence has been cited as the species' primary means of compensating for herbivory. However, ancillary rosette formation could also contribute to compensation in subsequent years. To determine if herbivory induces ancillary rosette formation and whether energy diverted to vegetative regrowth reduces reproductive output, we analyzed the response of scarlet gilia to elk herbivory in the Wenatchee National Forest of Washington State. Control plants were protected from herbivory by wire enclosures; clipped plants were hand-cut to simulate herbivory; and grazed plants were left vulnerable to elk herbivory. Ninety percent of plants that lost inflorescences regrew multiple flowering stalks; these plants produced fewer fruits and seeds than protected plants, indicating that scarlet gilia undercompensated for herbivory despite greater aboveground biomass. The plants that regrew multiple flowering stalks were also more likely to form ancillary rosettes, which could increase compensation over multiple seasons. Although herbivory reduced initial fecundity, grazing generated morphological changes that could enable the plant to achieve a greater degree of compensation over time.
引用
收藏
页码:1298 / 1303
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   THE EFFECTS OF GRAZERS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUALS AND POPULATIONS OF SCARLET-GILIA, IPOMOPSIS-AGGREGATA [J].
BERGELSON, J ;
CRAWLEY, MJ .
OECOLOGIA, 1992, 90 (03) :435-444
[2]   HERBIVORY AND IPOMOPSIS-AGGREGATA - THE DISADVANTAGES OF BEING EATEN [J].
BERGELSON, J ;
CRAWLEY, MJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1992, 139 (04) :870-882
[3]   Regrowth following herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: Compensation but not overcompensation [J].
Bergelson, J ;
Juenger, T ;
Crawley, MJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1996, 148 (04) :744-755
[4]   Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata [J].
Brody, AK ;
Mitchell, RJ .
OECOLOGIA, 1997, 110 (01) :86-93
[5]   EFFECTS OF FLORAL TRAITS ON SEQUENTIAL COMPONENTS OF FITNESS IN IPOMOPSIS-AGGREGATA [J].
CAMPBELL, DR .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1991, 137 (06) :713-737
[6]  
Campbell DR, 1997, EVOLUTION, V51, P373, DOI 10.2307/2411109
[7]   Pollination of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae):: Effects of intra- vs. interspecific competition [J].
Caruso, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1999, 86 (05) :663-668
[8]   FEEDING-BEHAVIOR AND HABITAT SELECTION OF MULE DEER AND ELK ON NORTHERN UTAH SUMMER RANGE [J].
COLLINS, WB ;
URNESS, PJ .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1983, 47 (03) :646-663
[9]   THE ECOLOGY OF PLANTS, LARGE MAMMALIAN HERBIVORES, AND DROUGHT IN YELLOWSTONE-NATIONAL-PARK [J].
FRANK, DA ;
MCNAUGHTON, SJ .
ECOLOGY, 1992, 73 (06) :2043-2058
[10]   TAXONOMY OF THE IPOMOPSIS-AGGREGATA GROUP (POLEMONIACEAE) [J].
GRANT, V ;
WILKEN, DH .
BOTANICAL GAZETTE, 1986, 147 (03) :359-371