Biological Agents for Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

被引:174
作者
Danese, Silvio
Fiorino, Gionata
Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent
Lucenteforte, Ersilia
Virgili, Gianni
Moja, Lorenzo
Bonovas, Stefanos
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Ctr Inflammatory Bowel Dis, IRCCS Humanitas Res Hosp, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthoped Inst, Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS Mario Negri Inst Pharmacol Res, Lab Drug Regulatory Policies, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Lorraine, Univ Hosp Nancy, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[4] Univ Florence, Florence, Italy
[5] Univ Athens, Sch Med, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
关键词
INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; EVIDENCE-BASED CONSENSUS; MAINTENANCE THERAPY; INDUCTION; GASTROENTEROLOGY; DEFINITIONS; VEDOLIZUMAB; ADALIMUMAB; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.7326/M13-2403
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Biological agents are emerging treatment options for the management of ulcerative colitis (UC). Purpose: To assess the comparative efficacy and harm of biological agents in adult patients with moderately to severely active UC who are naive to biological agents. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception through December 2013, without language restrictions, and ClinicalTrials.gov, European Medicines Agency, and U. S. Food and Drug Administration Web sites. Study Selection: Randomized, placebo-controlled or head-to-head trials assessing biological agents as induction or maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active UC. Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently abstracted study data and outcomes and rated each trial's risk of bias. Data Synthesis: There were no head-to-head trials. There were 7 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that were rated as low risk of bias and showed that all biological agents (adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, and vedolizumab) resulted in more clinical responses, clinical remissions, and mucosal healings than placebo for induction therapy. The results of network meta-analysis suggested that infliximab is more effective to induce clinical response (odds ratio, 2.36 [95% credible interval, 1.22 to 4.63]) and mucosal healing (odds ratio, 2.02 [95% credible interval, 1.13 to 3.59]) than adalimumab. No other indirect comparison reached statistical significance. For maintenance, 6 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that were rated high risk of bias showed that all biological agents have greater clinical efficacy than placebo. The occurrence of adverse events was not different between biological agents and placebo. Limitation: Few trials, no head-to-head comparisons, and inadequate follow-up in maintenance trials. Conclusion: Biological agents are effective treatments for UC, but head-to-head trials are warranted to establish the best therapeutic option.
引用
收藏
页码:704 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 20 UN EUR GASTR WEE
[2]  
[Anonymous], GAST DRUGS ADV COM M
[3]  
[Anonymous], NAT CLIN AUD REP BIO
[4]  
[Anonymous], DIS WEEK SAN DIEG
[5]  
[Anonymous], PROSPERO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INDIRECT EVIDENCE IN
[7]   Gastroenterology 2 - Inflammatory bowel disease: clinical aspects and established and evolving therapies [J].
Baumgart, Daniel C. ;
Sandborn, William J. .
LANCET, 2007, 369 (9573) :1641-1657
[8]   Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research - A systematic review [J].
Bekelman, JE ;
Li, Y ;
Gross, CP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (04) :454-465
[9]   Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence [J].
Caldwell, DM ;
Ades, AE ;
Higgins, JPT .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7521) :897-900
[10]   Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis [J].
Cipriani, Andrea ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Geddes, John R. ;
Salanti, Georgia .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 159 (02) :130-W54