The effect of exercise during haemodialysis on solute removal

被引:86
作者
Kong, CH [1 ]
Tattersall, JE [1 ]
Greenwood, RN [1 ]
Farrington, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Lister Hosp, Renal Unit, Stevenage SG1 4AB, Herts, England
关键词
blood flow; diffusion rate; exercise; haemodialysis; solute removal; urea rebound;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/14.12.2927
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Urea rebound results as urea re-equilibrates between intracellular and intravascular compartments post haemodialysis. The mechanism of the rebound is thought to be due to either a reduced diffusion rate or blood flow. It is hypothesized that low blood flow in the skeletal muscles might be responsible. We tested this by studying the effect of exercise during dialysis on the removal of urea, creatinine and potassium. Methods, Eleven patients (aged 32-78 years) on haemodialysis (4-58 months) were studied on paired dialysis sessions; one with exercise and the other as a control. Patients pedalled on a cycle for 5-20 min at submaximal workload followed by 10 min rest to achieve a total of 60 min exercise. Plasma concentrations of urea, creatinine and potassium were measured pre-, post- and 30-min post dialysis. The post-dialysis rebound (% rebound) and reduction ratios (RR) of the solutes and equilibrated (two-pool) urea Kt/V were calculated for comparison. Results. The rebound of all three solutes was reduced significantly following exercise. The rebound of urea decreased from 12.4 to 10.9% (median, P<0.01 Wilcoxon signed rank test), creatinine from 21.2 to 17.2% (P<0.001) and potassium from 62 to 44% (P<0.05). Kt/V and RR increased significantly as a result: Kt/V urea from 1.00 to 1.15 (P=0.001), RR urea from 0.63 to 0.68 (P<0.001); Kt/V creatinine from 0.71 to 0.84 (P<0.01); and RR creatinine from 0.51 to 0.57 (P<0.05). Conclusion. Exercise increased the efficiency of dialysis by reducing the rebound of solutes due to increased perfusion of the skeletal muscles.
引用
收藏
页码:2927 / 2931
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   UREA MOVEMENT ACROSS ERYTHROCYTE-MEMBRANE DURING ARTIFICIAL-KIDNEY TREATMENT [J].
CHEUNG, AK ;
ALFORD, MF ;
WILSON, MM ;
LEYPOLDT, JK ;
HENDERSON, LW .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1983, 23 (06) :866-869
[2]  
COLTON C K, 1970, Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series, V66, P85
[3]   RESTING SKELETAL-MUSCLE MEMBRANE-POTENTIAL AS AN INDEX OF UREMIC TOXICITY - PROPOSED NEW METHOD TO ASSESS ADEQUACY OF HEMODIALYSIS [J].
COTTON, JR ;
WOODARD, T ;
CARTER, NW ;
KNOCHEL, JP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1979, 63 (03) :501-506
[4]  
DESCOMBES E, 1993, CLIN NEPHROL, V40, P286
[5]   EXERCISE TRAINING REDUCES CORONARY RISK AND EFFECTIVELY REHABILITATES HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS [J].
GOLDBERG, AP ;
GELTMAN, EM ;
GAYIN, JR ;
CARNEY, RM ;
HAGBERG, JM ;
DELMEZ, JA ;
NAUMOVICH, A ;
OLDFIELD, MH ;
HARTER, HR .
NEPHRON, 1986, 42 (04) :311-316
[6]   WORK-INDUCED POTASSIUM CHANGES IN SKELETAL-MUSCLE AND EFFLUENT VENOUS-BLOOD ASSESSED BY LIQUID ION-EXCHANGER MICROELECTRODES [J].
HNIK, P ;
HOLAS, M ;
KREKULE, I ;
KRIZ, N ;
MEJSNAR, J ;
SMIESKO, V ;
UJEC, E ;
VYSKOCIL, F .
PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 362 (01) :85-94
[7]   EFFECTS OF EXERCISE TRAINING DURING HEMODIALYSIS [J].
PAINTER, PL ;
NELSONWOREL, JN ;
HILL, MM ;
THORNBERY, DR ;
SHELP, WR ;
HARRINGTON, AR ;
WEINSTEIN, AB .
NEPHRON, 1986, 43 (02) :87-92
[8]  
PENDRINI PR, 1988, KIDNEY INT, V34, P817
[9]  
POPOVICH RP, 1975, T AM SOC ART INT ORG, V21, P108
[10]  
Savazzi G M, 1980, Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc, V17, P312