Effects of dot density, patch size and contrast on the upper spatial limit for direction discrimination in random-dot kinematograms

被引:30
作者
Eagle, RA
Rogers, BJ
机构
[1] Dept. of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, South Parks Rd
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
motion detection; dot density; d(max); random-dot kinematograms;
D O I
10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00153-8
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
Two-frame random-dot kinematograms (RDKs) of different dot density, area and contrast were used to study the spatial properties of the human visual motion system, It was found that the maximum spatial displacement at which observers could reliably discriminate the direction of motion (d(max)) increased gradually by a factor of up to 6.4 as dot density was decreased from 50 to 0.025% for high Michelson contrast (0.997) stimuli. As stimulus area was reduced from 645 deg(2), this trend gradually disappeared so that by a stimulus area of 2.56 deg(2), there was no effect of density upon d(max). A further experiment investigated the effects of reducing Michelson contrast from 0.77 to 0.2 on d(max) over this same range of dot densities, It was found that at the highest densities, d(max) declined as contrast was reduced, Furthermore, for contrasts at and below 0.4, d(max) was invariant of density over the range 50-5%. These results can be accounted for by the fact that both reducing contrast, while keeping density fixed, and reducing density, while maintaining a fixed high contrast, reduce the stimulus mean luminance, For all contrasts, decreasing density below 5% led to an increase in d(max). However, the rate of this increase was slower for the lower contrast stimuli, A two-stage model based on bandpass filtering followed by an informationally limited motion detection stage is proposed and shown to provide a good account of these data. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2091 / 2102
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
ANDERSON SJ, 1989, VISION RES, V29, P1342
[2]
[Anonymous], 1915, Z PSYCHOL Z ANGEW PS
[3]
PHI MOVEMENT AS A SUBTRACTION PROCESS [J].
ANSTIS, SM .
VISION RESEARCH, 1970, 10 (12) :1411-&
[4]
THE PERCEPTION OF APPARENT MOVEMENT [J].
ANSTIS, SM ;
MACKAY, DM .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1980, 290 (1038) :153-168
[5]
SPATIAL RECEPTIVE-FIELD PROPERTIES OF DIRECTION-SELECTIVE NEURONS IN CAT STRIATE CORTEX [J].
BAKER, CL ;
CYNADER, MS .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 55 (06) :1136-1152
[6]
THE BASIS OF AREA AND DOT NUMBER EFFECTS IN RANDOM DOT MOTION PERCEPTION [J].
BAKER, CL ;
BRADDICK, OJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1982, 22 (10) :1253-1259
[7]
TEMPORAL PROPERTIES OF THE SHORT-RANGE PROCESS IN APPARENT MOTION [J].
BAKER, CL ;
BRADDICK, OJ .
PERCEPTION, 1985, 14 (02) :181-192
[8]
MASKING OF MOTION BY BROAD-BAND AND FILTERED DIRECTIONAL NOISE [J].
BALL, K ;
SEKULER, R .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1979, 26 (03) :206-214
[9]
BEYOND THE DISPLACEMENT LIMIT - AN ANALYSIS OF SHORT-RANGE PROCESSES IN APPARENT MOTION [J].
BISCHOF, WF ;
GRONER, M .
VISION RESEARCH, 1985, 25 (06) :839-847
[10]
PERCEPTION OF DIRECTIONAL SAMPLED MOTION IN RELATION TO DISPLACEMENT AND SPATIAL-FREQUENCY - EVIDENCE FOR A UNITARY MOTION SYSTEM [J].
BISCHOF, WF ;
DILOLLO, V .
VISION RESEARCH, 1990, 30 (09) :1341-1362