The concordance of self-report with other measures of medication adherence - A summary of the literature

被引:391
作者
Garber, MC
Nau, DP
Erickson, SR
Aikens, JE
Lawrence, JB
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Coll Pharm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Coll Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Corpus Christi Naval Hosp, Dept Pharm, Corpus Christi, TX USA
关键词
patient compliance; compliance measures; measurement accuracy;
D O I
10.1097/01.mlr.0000129496.05898.02
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the concordance of self-report measures of medication adherence (interview, diary, or questionnaire) with nonself-report measures of adherence (administrative claims, pill count or canister weight, plasma drug concentration, electronic monitors, or clinical opinion). Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify published reports in which self-report and nonself-report measures of adherence were used within the same study. The concordance of measures within each study was categorized as high, moderate, or low based on a comparison of the adherence estimates. Results: Eight-six comparisons of self-report to nonself-report measures of adherence were identified. Thirty-seven of the 86 comparisons (43%) were categorized as highly concordant. However, concordance varied substantially by type of self-report measure and nonself-report measure. Self-report measures, in general, were highly concordant with electronic measures in only 17% of comparisons, whereas they were highly concordant with other types of nonself-report measures in 58% of comparisons (chi-square = 14.30, P <0.01). When comparing self-report measures, interviews had significantly lower concordance with nonself-report measures as compared with questionnaires or diaries (chi-square = 8.47, P = 0.01). in 15 comparisons. of interviews with electronic measures,none of the comparisons were highly concordant, whereas questionnaires and diaries had moderate-to-high concordance with electronic measures in 12 of 16 comparisons (75%). Conclusions: The concordance of self-report and other measures of medication adherence varies widely based on the type of measures used. Questionnaires and diaries tend to have moderate-to-high concordance. with other measures of medication adherence. However, interview-based self-reports are not concordant with electronic measures. Questionnaire and diary methods could be preferable to interviews for self-reported medication adherence.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 652
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Evidence- based medicine
[2]  
Chen P.Y., 2002, Correlation: Parametric and nonparametric measures
[3]  
Cohen J., 1983, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES
[4]   Patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes - A meta-analysis [J].
DiMatteo, MR ;
Giordani, PJ ;
Lepper, HS ;
Croghan, TW .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (09) :794-811
[5]   Treatment adherence in chronic disease [J].
Dunbar-Jacob, J ;
Mortimer-Stephens, MK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 :S57-S60
[6]   Methods for measuring and monitoring medication regimen adherence in clinical trials and clinical practice [J].
Farmer, KC .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 21 (06) :1074-1090
[7]  
Gao X, 2000, ANN PHARMACOTHER, V34, P1117
[8]  
Haynes RB TD., 1979, COMPLIANCE HLTH CARE
[9]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[10]   Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions - Scientific review [J].
McDonald, HP ;
Garg, AX ;
Haynes, RB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (22) :2868-2879