Stage II colon cancer prognosis prediction by tumor gene expression profiling

被引:161
作者
Barrier, Alain
Boelle, Pierre-Yves
Roser, Francois
Gregg, Jennifer
Tse, Chantal
Brault, Didier
Lacaine, Francois
Houry, Sidney
Huguier, Michel
Franc, Brigitte
Flahault, Antoine
Lemoine, Antoinette
Dudoit, Sandrine
机构
[1] Hop Tenon, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Serv Chirurg Digest, F-75020 Paris, France
[2] INSERM, Epidemiol Syst Informat & Modelisat U707, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 06, UMR S 707, Paris, France
[4] Hop Tenon, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Serv Biochim, F-75970 Paris, France
[5] INSERM, Microenvironm & Physiopathol Differenciat U602, Villejuif, France
[6] Hop Ambroise Pare, Assistance Publ Hop Paris, Serv Anat Pathol, Boulogne, France
[7] Univ Versailles, Boulogne, France
[8] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[9] Univ Calif San Francisco, J David Gladstones Inst, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0229
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose This study mainly aimed to identify and assess the performance of a microarray-based prognosis predictor (PP) for stage II colon cancer. A previously suggested 23-gene prognosis signature (PS) was also evaluated. Patients and Methods Tumor mRNA samples from 50 patients were profiled using oligonucleotide microarrays. PPs were built and assessed by random divisions of patients into training and validation sets (TSs and VSs, respectively). For each TS/VS split, a 30-gene PP, identified on the TS by selecting the 30 most differentially expressed genes and applying diagonal linear discriminant analysis, was used to predict the prognoses of VS patients. Two schemes were considered: single-split validation, based on a single random split of patients into two groups of equal size ( group 1 and group 2), and Monte Carlo cross validation (MCCV), whereby patients were repeatedly and randomly divided into TS and VS of various sizes. Results The 30-gene PP, identified from group 1 patients, yielded an 80% prognosis prediction accuracy on group 2 patients. MCCV yielded the following average prognosis prediction performance measures: 76.3% accuracy, 85.1% sensitivity, and 67.5% specificity. Improvements in prognosis prediction were observed with increasing TS size. The 30-gene PS were found to be highly-variable across TS/VS splits. Assessed on the same random splits of patients, the previously suggested 23-gene PS yielded a 67.7% mean prognosis prediction accuracy. Conclusion Microarray gene expression profiling is able to predict the prognosis of stage II colon cancer patients. The present study also illustrates the usefulness of resampling techniques for honest performance assessment of microarray-based PPs.
引用
收藏
页码:4685 / 4691
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Gene expression profiling of nonneoplastic mucosa may predict clinical outcome of colon cancer patients
    Barrier, A
    Boelle, PY
    Lemoine, A
    Tse, C
    Brault, D
    Chiappini, F
    Lacaine, F
    Houry, S
    Huguier, M
    Flahault, A
    Dudoit, S
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (12) : 2238 - 2248
  • [2] Colon cancer prognosis prediction by gene expression profiling
    Barrier, A
    Lemoine, A
    Boelle, PY
    Tse, C
    Brault, D
    Chiappini, F
    Breittschneider, J
    Lacaine, F
    Houry, S
    Huguier, M
    Van der Laan, MJ
    Speed, T
    Debuire, B
    Flahault, A
    Dudoit, S
    [J]. ONCOGENE, 2005, 24 (40) : 6155 - 6164
  • [3] Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma
    Beer, DG
    Kardia, SLR
    Huang, CC
    Giordano, TJ
    Levin, AM
    Misek, DE
    Lin, L
    Chen, GA
    Gharib, TG
    Thomas, DG
    Lizyness, ML
    Kuick, R
    Hayasaka, S
    Taylor, JMG
    Iannettoni, MD
    Orringer, MB
    Hanash, S
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2002, 8 (08) : 816 - 824
  • [4] Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses
    Bhattacharjee, A
    Richards, WG
    Staunton, J
    Li, C
    Monti, S
    Vasa, P
    Ladd, C
    Beheshti, J
    Bueno, R
    Gillette, M
    Loda, M
    Weber, G
    Mark, EJ
    Lander, ES
    Wong, W
    Johnson, BE
    Golub, TR
    Sugarbaker, DJ
    Meyerson, M
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (24) : 13790 - 13795
  • [5] Bolstad BM, 2005, STAT BIOL HEALTH, P13
  • [6] Chen F W, 1999, Int Rev Immunol, V18, P429, DOI 10.3109/08830189909088492
  • [7] Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data
    Dudoit, S
    Fridlyand, J
    Speed, TP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 97 (457) : 77 - 87
  • [8] Dudoit S, 2003, INTERDISC STAT, P93
  • [9] Dudoit S., 2005, Statistical Methodology, V2, P131, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.STAMET.2005.02.003
  • [10] Adjuvant therapy for stage II colon cancer: A systematic review from the Cancer Care Ontario Program in evidence-based care's gastrointestinal cancer disease site group
    Figueredo, A
    Charette, ML
    Maroun, J
    Brouwers, MC
    Zuraw, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (16) : 3395 - 3407