A Relevance Index for the habitat areas of Natura 2000 Network based on their Rarity and Representativeness

被引:6
作者
Duarte, Ines [1 ]
Rego, Francisco Castro [1 ]
Casquilho, Jose Pinto [1 ,2 ]
Arsenio, Pedro [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Agron, Ctr Ecol Aplicada Prof Baeta Neves, InBio, P-1349017 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Nacl Timor Lorosae, Dili, Timor Leste, Romania
[3] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Agron, Ctr Invest Agron Alimentos Ambiente & Paisagem, P-1349017 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Rarity; Representativeness; Relevance; Habitat type; Natura; 2000; Sites; CONSERVATION PRIORITIES; MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION; DIVERSITY; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.015
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The 231 habitat types included in the European Environmental Agency (EEA) database of the Natura 2000 Network are distributed throughout more than 22 thousand Sites of Community Importance (SCI) covering around 128 million hectares in Europe. However, individual habitat areas have different conservation relevance according to the Rarity of the habitat type and their Representativeness in relation to the whole type. We propose a Relevance Index and evaluate it for each area of each habitat type, taking into account the Rarity of the habitat type, assessed by the extent of its occurrence in the Natura 2000 Network, and the Representativeness of the area, as the contribution of that area to the total extent of that habitat type in the Network. Results allow for an objective analysis of the Natura 2000 Network indicating, for example, that rarity of a habitat type in Natura 2000 Network does not necessarily correlate with its priority status, suggesting the need for reevaluation of the situation. The Relevance Index proposed for a given habitat area is the product of the Rarity Index of its habitat type and the Representativeness of the area. We demonstrate the application of the Index for the areas of three different Natura 2000 Sites. The Relevance Index of one Site (SRI) will be the sum of the Relevance Indices of its corresponding habitat areas (HRI). The same approach is applicable to regions, countries or for any habitat cluster allowing for the quantification of their contribution to the whole Natura 2000 Network It is suggested that the Relevance index can also be applied in monitoring the components of the Natura 2000 Network, and is useful to support management decisions for conservation in Europe. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 213
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PRINCIPLES CONSERVAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY TH
[3]   Mapping ecological vulnerability to fire for effective conservation management of natural protected areas [J].
Aretano, Roberta ;
Semeraro, Teodoro ;
Petrosillo, Irene ;
De Marco, Antonella ;
Pasimeni, Maria Rita ;
Zurlini, Giovanni .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2015, 295 :163-175
[4]   Don't think local! Scale in conservation, parochialism, dogmatic bureaucracy and the implementing of the European Directives [J].
Battisti, Corrado ;
Fanelli, Giuliano .
JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2015, 24 :24-30
[5]   A QUANTITATIVE-QUALITATIVE MEASURE OF INFORMATION IN CYBERNETIC SYSTEMS [J].
BELIS, M ;
GUIASU, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1968, 14 (04) :593-+
[6]   USEFUL INFORMATION AND QUESTIONNAIRES [J].
BOUCHON, B .
INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 1976, 32 (04) :368-378
[7]  
Cann R., 2009, Semantics: An Introduction to Meaning in Language
[8]  
Casquilho J., 1997, AN I SUPER AGRON, V48, P77
[9]  
Casquilho J., 2014, NAT SCI, V6, P545, DOI 10.4236/ns.2014.67054
[10]  
Casquilho J.P., 2015, THEOR EC LETT, V5, P185, DOI DOI 10.4236/TEL.2015.52023