Comparing accountability in the public and private sectors

被引：60

作者：

Mulgan, R ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Australian Natl Univ, Publ Policy Program, Canberra, ACT, Australia

来源：

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION | 2000年 / 59卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/1467-8500.00142

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;

摘要：

Analysis of public accountability tends to concentrate on public sector institutions. However increasing use of the private sector in the provision of public services suggests the need to compare accountability in the two sectors, While private sector (for-profit) companies are more accountable in terms of their 'bottom line', accountability requirements in the public sector are generally more stringent, particularly with regard to process and general policy.

引用

页码：87 / 97

页数：11

共 26 条

[1]

Airo-Farulla G, 1992, PUBLIC LAW REV, V3, P186

[2]

[Anonymous], 1996, AUSTR PUBLIC SECTOR

[3]

[Anonymous], 1988, PUBLIC SERVICE ACCOU

[4]

*ARC, 1997, CONTR OUT GOV SERV A

[5] The new public management and a new accountability [J].

Barberis, P .

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1998, 76 (03) :451-470

[6]

Bottomley S, 1997, SYD LAW REV, V19, P277

[7]

Bovens Mark., 1998, QUEST RESPONSIBILITY

[8] Accountability and governance under the new regulatory state [J].

Braithwaite, J .

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1999, 58 (01) :90-94

[9]

Day P., 1987, ACCOUNTABILITIES 5 P

[10]

*DIST CONS AFF DIV, 1997, DIR CONS DISP RES SC

← 1 2 3 →