Immune response after primary and re-vaccination with different combined vaccines against measles, mumps, rubella

被引:49
作者
Tischer, A [1 ]
Gerike, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Robert Koch Inst, Natl Reference Ctr Measles Mumps Rubella, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
measles; mumps; rubella vaccines; re-vaccination; humoral immune response;
D O I
10.1016/S0264-410X(99)00397-7
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The humoral immune response after primary and re-vaccination confirmed the high immunogenicity of the combined vaccines used: "MMR-Vax(R)" "Pluserix(R)" and "Triviraten(R)". The investigation of paired serum samples of prevaccinal seronegative infants (n = 365) by an enzyme immune assay (Enzygnost(R)) exhibited seroconversion rates of >90-100% for all three components with the exception of the mumps component of "Triviraten(R)" (38%). However, by additional methods (plaque neutralisation test, immunofluorescence test) mumps antibodies could be detected in 93.4% of infants having received vaccine "Triviraten(R)". The mean values of antibody activities against the three components did not differ significantly after vaccination with "MMR-Vax(R)" and "Pluserix(R)". However, after vaccination with "Triviraten(R)" the mean antibody values were significantly lower (P < 0.01) against the measles strain "Edmonston-Zagreb" and especially lower (2-20 times) against the mumps virus strain "Rubini". Revaccination of pre-vaccinal seropositive schoolchildren and adolescents (n = 676) with "MMRVax(R)" and "Pluserix(R)" produced no different results. The rate of vaccinees responding with a booster reaction reached 68.4% for measles and mumps, but only 8.6% for rubella. A booster reaction could be observed in 100% of those vaccinees who had antibodies at a low level, also in the case of naturally acquired immunity. The low-level range for antibodies against measles was defined as 0.15 < 0.40 IU/ml, mumps 1:230 less than or equal to 1:500 and rubella 7-16 IU/ml. The rate of vaccinees with low-level antibodies against measles can become as high as 10%, for mumps 20% and for rubella 3%. The correlation between the level of antibodies and protection against the disease is discussed. The rate of individuals in a population with doubtful protection (unvaccinated, non-responder and low responder after primary vaccination) prevents to reach the herd immunity of 95% necessary for elimination. The results of our serological studies strongly recommend re-vaccination against measles, mumps and rubella. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1382 / 1392
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COMMUN DIS REP CDR R
[2]   Complications of mumps vaccines [J].
Balraj, V ;
Miller, E .
REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 1995, 5 (04) :219-227
[3]  
BELLINI WJ, 1994, J INFECT DIS, V170, P15
[4]  
BERGER R, 1988, BIOL STAND, V16, P269
[5]  
BIN D, 1991, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V69, P415
[6]   Immunity to rubella before and after vaccination against measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) at 12 years of age of the first generation offered MMR vaccination in Sweden at 18 months [J].
Bottiger, M .
VACCINE, 1995, 13 (18) :1759-1762
[7]   MEASLES, MUMPS, AND RUBELLA ANTIBODIES IN CHILDREN 5-6 YEARS AFTER IMMUNIZATION - EFFECT OF VACCINE TYPE AND AGE AT VACCINATION [J].
BOULIANNE, N ;
DESERRES, G ;
RATNAM, S ;
WARD, BJ ;
JOLY, JR ;
DUVAL, B .
VACCINE, 1995, 13 (16) :1611-1616
[8]   SUSTAINED TRANSMISSION OF MUMPS IN A HIGHLY VACCINATED POPULATION - ASSESSMENT OF PRIMARY VACCINE FAILURE AND WANING VACCINE-INDUCED IMMUNITY [J].
BRISS, PA ;
FEHRS, LJ ;
PARKER, RA ;
WRIGHT, PF ;
SANNELLA, EC ;
HUTCHESON, RH ;
SCHAFFNER, W .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1994, 169 (01) :77-82
[9]   Immunity to mumps before and after MMR vaccination at 12 years of age in the first generation offered the two-dose immunization programme [J].
Broliden, K ;
Abreu, ER ;
Arneborn, M ;
Böttiger, M .
VACCINE, 1998, 16 (2-3) :323-327
[10]   Measles immunity and response to revaccination among secondary school children in Cumbria [J].
Calvert, N ;
Cutts, F ;
Irving, R ;
Brown, D ;
Marsh, J ;
Miller, E .
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 1996, 116 (01) :65-70