Contraction and Convergence of carbon emissions:: an intertemporal multi-region CGE analysis

被引:64
作者
Böhringer, C
Welsch, H
机构
[1] ZEW, Ctr European Econ Res, D-68034 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Econ, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Dept Econ, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
关键词
computable general equilibrium modeling; climate protection; emissions trading;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpolmod.2003.11.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the context of climate protection policy, it has been suggested that global CO2 emissions should be reduced significantly (contraction) and that per capita emissions should gradually be equalized across countries (convergence). This paper uses an intertemporal multi-region computable general equilibrium model of the world economy to assess the economics of "Contraction and Convergence" (C&C). Upon comparing a regime of tradable and non-tradable emission rights for implementing C&C, we find that international emissions trading increases crucially the political feasibility of the C&C proposal. The reason is that the distribution of the total efficiency gains from permit trading not only improves the economic well-being of all regions as compared to strictly domestic action, but in particular raises economic welfare of major opponents to carbon restrictions from the developing world even beyond non-abatement baseline levels. A decomposition of the general equilibrium effects associated with C&C shows that changes in the terms of trade constitute a key determinant of the overall welfare effects. (C) 2004 Society for Policy Modeling. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 39
页数:19
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
[Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE DESIG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Buying greenhouse insurance: the economic costs of carbon dioxide emission limits
[4]  
ARMINGTON PS, 1969, INT MONET FUND S PAP, V16, P159
[5]   THE EQUITABLE INTERNATIONAL ALLOCATION OF TRADABLE CARBON EMISSION PERMITS [J].
BECKERMAN, W ;
PASEK, J .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1995, 5 (05) :405-413
[7]  
Bohm P., 1994, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V4, P219, DOI [10.1007/BF00692325, DOI 10.1007/BF00692325]
[8]   Cooling down hot air:: a global CGE analysis of post-Kyoto carbon abatement strategies [J].
Böhringer, C .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (11) :779-789
[9]  
BOHRINGER C, 2002, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V22, P319
[10]  
*IEA, 1996, INT EN AG EN PRIC TA