Risk factors for positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy: review

被引:2
作者
Descazeaud, A. [1 ]
Zerbib, M. [1 ]
Peyromaure, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Cochin, Serv Urol, F-75014 Paris, France
关键词
prostate carcinoma; radical prostatectomy; surgical margins; prognosis;
D O I
10.1016/j.anuro.2006.09.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The presence of positive surgical margins on radical prostatectomy specimen is an adverse prognostic factor. Parameters supposed to influence surgical margin status includes pathology method analysis, surgical technique, tumoural and non tumoural patient parameters, and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Regarding the surgical technique, surgeon's experience and neuro-vascular bundles preservation are the most important factors of margin status, whereas surgical approach, bladder neck conservation, intraoperative frozen analysis, and bleeding are minor factors. Non tumoural patient parameters influencing surgical margin status include patient's age and weight, and prostate gland weight. For tumoural parameters, pathological stage and tumour volume are more important factors than the tumour grade and PSA. Five preoperative tumoural risk factors of positive surgical margins are particularly important, including abnormal digital rectal examination, preoperative PSA 10ng/mL, biopsy Gleason score 7, number of positive biopsy cores >= 2, and suspicion of extraprostatic extension on radical prostatectomy specimen. (c) 2006 Elsevier Masson SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 348
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   ANALYSIS OF RISK-FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PROSTATE-CANCER EXTENSION TO THE SURGICAL MARGIN AND PELVIC NODE METASTASIS AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY [J].
ACKERMAN, DA ;
BARRY, JM ;
WICKLUND, RA ;
OLSON, N ;
LOWE, BA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (06) :1845-1850
[2]   Neoadjuvant androgen ablation for localized prostatic cancer: Pathology methods, surgical end points and meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Bonney, WW ;
Schned, AR ;
Timberlake, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (05) :1754-1760
[3]   Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Cangiano, TG ;
Litwin, MS ;
Naitoh, J ;
Dorey, F ;
deKernion, JB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (03) :655-658
[4]   Pereneural invasion in prostate cancer biopsies is not associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins [J].
Cannon, GM ;
Pound, CR ;
Landsittel, DP ;
Bastacky, SI ;
Dhir, R ;
Becich, MJ ;
Nelson, JB .
PROSTATE, 2005, 63 (04) :336-340
[5]   NERVE-SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - EVALUATION OF RESULTS AFTER 250 PATIENTS [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
BIGG, SW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (03) :538-544
[6]   Local staging of prostate cancer by endorectal MRI using fast spin-echo sequences: Prospective correlation with pathological findings after radical prostatectomy [J].
Cornud, F ;
Belin, X ;
Flam, T ;
Chretien, Y ;
Deslignieres, S ;
Paraf, F ;
Casanova, JM ;
Thiounn, N ;
Helenon, O ;
Debre, B ;
Dufour, B ;
Moreau, JF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 77 (06) :843-850
[7]  
DAMICO AV, 1995, CANCER, V75, P2368, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950501)75:9<2368::AID-CNCR2820750929>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-#
[9]   Critical analysis of the ability of the endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging scan to predict pathologic stage, margin status, and postoperative prostate-specific antigen failure in patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer [J].
DAmico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Schnall, M ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Wein, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (06) :1770-1777
[10]  
DESCAZEAUD A, 2005, PROG UROL S1, V5