Organ donors and nondonors - An American dilemma

被引:56
作者
Peters, TG
Kittur, DS
McGaw, LJ
First, MR
Nelson, EW
机构
[1] UNITED NETWORK ORGAN SHARING,RICHMOND,VA 23225
[2] METHODIST MED CTR,JACKSONVILLE TRANSPLANT CTR,JACKSONVILLE,FL
[3] UNIV FLORIDA,DEPT SURG,JACKSONVILLE,FL
[4] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,DEPT SURG,BALTIMORE,MD
[5] UNIV CINCINNATI,DIV NEPHROL,CINCINNATI,OH
[6] UNIV UTAH,DEPT SURG,SALT LAKE CITY,UT
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.156.21.2419
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The principal motive for organ donation in the United States remains altruism. Surveys suggest that if the life-threatening and critical shortage of cadaveric donor organs were appropriately understood by the public, an altruistic response would lead to increased donation. However, despite intense educational efforts appealing to altruism, cadaveric organ donation has not increased substantially while the number of patients in need of a lifesaving organ has grown markedly. To understand why organ donation has not increased, a telephone survey and focus group sessions of volunteers who were either for or against donation (donors and nondonors, respectively) were reviewed. The focus group nondonors demonstrated a remarkable lack of trust in the fairness of organ allocation and in the success of transplantation; indeed, this mistrust extended to the entire medical profession. The donors in the focus groups, on the other hand, believed that the system worked equitably, although their knowledge about organ donation and transplantation was equivalent to that of nondonors. For organ donation to increase, efforts must be directed toward those who are not convinced that donation is for the common welfare. One way to increase organ donation is for physicians to educate their patients better regarding the equity and success of transplantation.
引用
收藏
页码:2419 / 2424
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF DONOR AGE ON OUTCOME OF KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION - A 2-YEAR ANALYSIS OF TRANSPLANTS REPORTED TO THE UNITED-NETWORK-FOR-ORGAN-SHARING-REGISTRY
    ALEXANDER, JW
    BENNETT, LE
    BREEN, TJ
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1994, 57 (06) : 871 - 876
  • [2] ALEXANDER JW, 1994, UNOS UPDATE, P8
  • [3] DIRECTED DONATION - THE RELEVANCE OF RACE
    ARNASON, WB
    [J]. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1991, 21 (06) : 13 - 19
  • [4] BENNETT LE, 1994, P 4 WORLD C TRANSPL
  • [5] BOWDEN A, 1993, CONTROVERSIES ORGAN
  • [6] ORGAN DONATION AND BLACKS - A CRITICAL FRONTIER
    CALLENDER, CO
    HALL, LE
    YEAGER, CL
    BARBER, JB
    DUNSTON, GM
    PINNWIGGINS, VW
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 325 (06) : 442 - 444
  • [7] CALLENDER CO, 1994, CONT DIALYSIS NEPHRO, V15, P34
  • [8] *COUNC ETH JUD AFF, 1994, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V272, P809
  • [9] DAVIDSON MN, 1991, TRANSPLANT P, V3, P2531
  • [10] *GALL ORG INC PART, 1993, AM PUBL ATT ORG DON