Bankart repair in traumatic anterior shoulder instability: Open versus arthroscopic technique

被引:152
作者
Kim, SH
Ha, KI
Kim, SH
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg,Kangnam Ku, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sports Med Inst, Seoul 135710, South Korea
关键词
anterior instability; bankart repair; open; arthroscopy; result; suture anchor; shoulder;
D O I
10.1053/jars.2002.31701
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of open and arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors in traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. Variables measured were recurrence rate, range of motion, and return to preinjury activity. Type of Study: Case control study. Methods: Eighty-nine shoulders in 88 patients with traumatic unilateral anterior shoulder instability were evaluated using Rowe and University of California Los Angeles scores, recurrence, return to activity, and range of motion by an independent examiner at an average of 39 months after either an arthroscopic or open Bankart repair using suture anchors. The arthroscopic technique included a minimum of 3 anchors in most patients and a routine incorporation of capsular plication and proximal shift. Of the 89 shoulders, 30 shoulders (30 patients) underwent open Bankart repair and 59 shoulders (58 patients) underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. Results: Twenty-six shoulders (86.6%) in the open repair group showed excellent or good results, and 54 (91.5%) shoulders in the arthroscopic repair group showed excellent or good results. The arthroscopic group revealed slightly higher scores in the Rowe (P = .041) and UCLA scores (P = .026). Two patients (6.7%) in the open repair group and 2 (3.4%) in the arthroscopic repair group had experienced at least I episode of redislocation after the surgery. One patient (3.3%) in the open repair group and 4 (6.8%) in the arthroscopic repair group demonstrated mild apprehension. The overall residual instability was 10% in the open repair group and 10.2% in the arthroscopic repair group. There were no significant differences in the loss of external rotation and return to prior activity between the 2 groups (P > .05). Residual instability occurred more frequently in patients with fewer anchors. Conclusions: Arthroscopic suture anchor capsulorraphy showed similar results to the open Bankart procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 763
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   T-PLASTY MODIFICATION OF THE BANKART PROCEDURE FOR MULTIDIRECTIONAL INSTABILITY OF THE ANTERIOR AND INFERIOR TYPES [J].
ALTCHEK, DW ;
WARREN, RF ;
SKYHAR, MJ ;
ORTIZ, G .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1991, 73A (01) :105-112
[2]  
BENEDETTO K P, 1992, Arthroscopy, V8, P111, DOI 10.1016/0749-8063(92)90144-Z
[3]   THE INSIDE-OUT BANKART PROCEDURE [J].
BERG, EE ;
ELLISON, AE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1990, 18 (02) :129-133
[4]   TENSILE PROPERTIES OF THE INFERIOR GLENOHUMERAL LIGAMENT [J].
BIGLIANI, LU ;
POLLOCK, RG ;
SOSLOWSKY, LJ ;
FLATOW, EL ;
PAWLUK, RJ ;
MOW, VC .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1992, 10 (02) :187-197
[5]  
Caspari RB., 1988, TECH ORTHOP, V3, P59, DOI [10.1097/00013611-198804000-00010, DOI 10.1097/00013611-198804000-00010]
[6]   REPAIR OF THE ROTATOR CUFF - END-RESULT STUDY OF FACTORS INFLUENCING RECONSTRUCTION [J].
ELLMAN, H ;
HANKER, G ;
BAYER, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1986, 68A (08) :1136-1144
[7]  
Geiger DF, 1997, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P111
[8]   Bankart repair for anterior instability of the shoulder - Long-term outcomes [J].
Gill, TJ ;
Micheli, LJ ;
Gebhard, F ;
Binder, C .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (06) :850-857
[9]   ARTHROSCOPIC BANKART SUTURE REPAIR [J].
GRANA, WA ;
BUCKLEY, PD ;
YATES, CK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1993, 21 (03) :348-353
[10]   ARTHROSCOPIC BANKART PROCEDURE - 2-YEAR TO 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP WITH CLINICAL CORRELATION TO SEVERITY OF GLENOID LABRAL LESION [J].
GREEN, MR ;
CHRISTENSEN, KP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (03) :276-281