Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization

被引:142
作者
Applegate, RJ [1 ]
Grabarczyk, MA
Little, WC
Craven, T
Walkup, M
Kahl, FR
Braden, GA
Rankin, KM
Kutcher, MA
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Cardiol Sect, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC USA
[3] Mid State Cardiol, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01924-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The study assessed clinical outcomes of closure device use following percutaneous coronary revascularization using current standards of anticoagulation and antiplateler therapy. BACKGROUND Evaluation of the outcomes of patients by use of vascular closure devices during coronary interventions employing current standards of anticoagulation and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy is limited. METHODS We evaluated outcomes of 4,525 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between July 1997 and April 2000. All patients received anticoagulation with heparin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy with abciximab. The closure method was manual in 1,824 patients, Angloseal in 524 patients and Perclose in 2,177 patients. Procedural and hospital vascular outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Closure device success was 97.1% Angloseal and 94.1% Perclose (p < 0.05). Minor vascular complications occurred in 1.8% of manual patients, 1.1% of Angioseal patients and 1.2% of Perclose patients (p = NS); major complications occurred in 1.3% of manual patients, 1.1% of Angioseal patients and 1.0% of Perclose patients (p = NS). Multivariate logistic regression identified only closure device failure as an independent predictor of a vascular complication. In patients with successful closure with a device, minor complications (0.8% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.05) and any complication (1.5% vs. 2.5%, p < 0.05) were reduced compared to manual compression. CONCLUSIONS Arterial closure following coronary interventions using anticoagulation and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy can be safely and effectively performed, with vascular complication rates similar to or lower than with manual pressure. Additionally, vascular complication rates using GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy regardless of the method of arterial closure are equivalent to or lower than previously published rates of vascular complications. (C) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 83
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   IMMEDIATE ARTERIAL HEMOSTASIS AFTER CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION - INITIAL EXPERIENCE WITH A NEW PUNCTURE CLOSURE DEVICE [J].
AKER, UT ;
KENSEY, KR ;
HEUSER, RR ;
SANDZA, JG ;
KUSSMAUL, WG .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1994, 31 (03) :228-232
[2]   Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: Results of the suture to ambulate and discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials [J].
Baim, DS ;
Knopf, WD ;
Hinohara, T ;
Schwarten, DE ;
Schatz, RA ;
Pinkerton, CA ;
Cutlip, DE ;
Fitzpatrick, M ;
Ho, KKL ;
Kuntz, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 85 (07) :864-869
[3]   Vascular access site complications after percutaneous coronary intervention with abciximab in the evaluation of c7E3 for the prevention of ischemic complications (EPIC) trial [J].
Blankenship, JC ;
Hellkamp, AS ;
Aguirre, FV ;
Demko, SL ;
Topol, EJ ;
Califf, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 81 (01) :36-40
[4]   Improved clinical effectiveness with a collagen vascular hemostasis device for shortened immobilization time following diagnostic angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [J].
Brachmann, J ;
Ansah, M ;
Kosinski, EJ ;
Schuler, GC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 81 (12) :1502-+
[5]  
Carey D, 2001, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V52, P3, DOI 10.1002/1522-726X(200101)52:1<3::AID-CCD1002>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-G
[7]  
Chamberlin JR, 1999, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V47, P143, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199906)47:2<143::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-M
[9]   Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices [J].
Dangas, G ;
Mehran, R ;
Kokolis, S ;
Feldman, D ;
Satler, LF ;
Pichard, AD ;
Kent, KM ;
Lansky, AJ ;
Stone, GW ;
Leon, MB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (03) :638-641
[10]  
Duffin D C, 2001, J Invasive Cardiol, V13, P354