Orienting response reinstatement and dishabituation: Effects of substituting, adding, and deleting components of nonsignificant stimuli

被引:7
作者
Ben-Shakhar, G [1 ]
Gati, I [1 ]
Ben-Bassat, N [1 ]
Sniper, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Psychol, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
orienting response; dishabituation. stimulus novelty; feature-matching theory; skin conductance response;
D O I
10.1017/S0048577200981629
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The prediction that orienting response (OR) reinstatement is negatively related to the measure of common features, shared by the stimulus input and representations of preceding events, and positively related to the measures of their distinctive features, was examined. A nonsignificant test stimulus (TS) was presented after nine repetitions of a standard stimulus (SS), followed by two additional repetitions of SS. TS was created by either substituting 0, 1, or 2 components of SS (Experiment 1), or by either adding or deleting 0, 1. or 2 components of SS (Experiment 2). Skin conductance changes to TS (OR reinstatement) and the subsequent SS (dishabituation) were used as dependent measures. The results of Experiment supported the prediction that substituting components of neutral stimuli affects OR reinstatement, with a larger effect for between-categories than within-categories substitution. Experiment 2 demonstrated that adding and deleting components similarly affects: OR reinstatement.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 110
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   STIMULUS OMISSION AND THE ORIENTING RESPONSE [J].
BARRY, RJ .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 21 (05) :535-540
[3]   GENERALIZATION OF THE ORIENTING RESPONSE TO SIGNIFICANT STIMULI - THE ROLES OF COMMON AND DISTINCTIVE STIMULUS COMPONENTS [J].
BENSHAKHAR, G ;
GATI, I ;
SALAMON, N .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 32 (01) :36-42
[4]   STIMULUS NOVELTY AND SIGNIFICANCE AS DETERMINANTS OF ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSIVITY - THE SERIAL POSITION EFFECT [J].
BENSHAKHAR, G ;
ASHER, T ;
POZNANSKYLEVY, A ;
ASHEROWITZ, R ;
LIEBLICH, I .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 26 (01) :29-38
[5]   THE ROLES OF STIMULUS NOVELTY AND SIGNIFICANCE IN DETERMINING THE ELECTRODERMAL ORIENTING RESPONSE - INTERACTIVE VERSUS ADDITIVE APPROACHES [J].
BENSHAKHAR, G .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 31 (04) :402-411
[6]   THE EFFECT OF COMMON VERSUS DISTINCTIVE STIMULUS FEATURES ON ELECTRODERMAL ORIENTATION TO SIGNIFICANT STIMULI [J].
BENSHAKHAR, G ;
GATI, I .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 29 (03) :306-314
[7]   COMMON AND DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF VERBAL AND PICTORIAL STIMULI AS DETERMINANTS OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSIVITY [J].
BENSHAKHAR, G ;
GATI, I .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1987, 116 (02) :91-105
[8]   ORIENTING RESPONSE AS NOVELTY AND SIGNIFICANCE DETECTOR - REPLY [J].
BERNSTEIN, AS .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 16 (03) :263-273
[9]   TO WHAT DOES ORIENTING RESPONSE RESPOND [J].
BERNSTEIN, AS .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1969, 6 (03) :338-+
[10]   STIMULUS GENERALIZATION OF HABITUATION OF GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE [J].
CORMAN, CD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 74 (2P1) :236-&