Why not LF for false belief reasoning?

被引：3

作者：

de Villiers, JG ^{[1
]}

de Villiers, PA ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Smith Coll, Dept Psychol, Clark Sci Ctr, Northampton, MA 01063 USA

来源：

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES | 2002年 / 25卷 / 06期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1017/S0140525X02310124

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

We argue that natural language has the right degree of representational richness for false belief reasoning especially the complements under verbs of communication and belief. Language may indeed be necessary synchronically for cross-modular reasoning, but certain achievements in language seem neccessary at least diachronically for explicit reasoning about false beliefs.

引用

页码：682 / +

页数：9

共 11 条

[1] IMPLICIT UNDERSTANDING OF BELIEF [J].

CLEMENTS, WA ;

PERNER, J .

COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 9 (04) :377-395

[2]

de Villiers J. G., 2000, CHILDRENS REASONING

[3] Complements to cognition: a longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding [J].

de Villiers, JG ;

Pyers, JE .

COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 17 (01) :1037-1060

[4] INTENTIONAL SYSTEMS IN COGNITIVE ETHOLOGY - THE PANGLOSSIAN PARADIGM DEFENDED [J].

DENNETT, DC .

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1983, 6 (03) :343-355

[5]

DEVILLIERS JG, 2002, WHITHER WHORF

[6]

DEVILLIERS JG, 1997, P 21 ANN BOST U C LA

[7] A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge [J].

Dienes, Z ;

Perner, J .

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1999, 22 (05) :735-+

[8]

Fodor J., 1975, LANGUAGE THOUGHT

[9]

JACKSON AP, 1996, BIOMEMBR, V4, P1

[10]

Olson DavidR., 1994, WORLD PAPER CONCEPTU

← 1 2 →