Comparison of polymerase chain reaction assays with bacteriologic culture, immunofluorescence, and nucleic acid hybridization for detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar hardjo in urine of cattle

被引:42
作者
Wagenaar, J
Zuerner, RL
Alt, D
Bolin, CA
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Natl Anim Dis Ctr, Bacterial Dis Livestock Res Unit, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[2] Univ Utrecht, Fac Vet Med, Inst Infect Dis & Immunol, Dept Bacteriol, NL-3508 TD Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.316
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective-To compare sensitivity and specificity of various polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar hardjo in bovine urine and to compare results of the optimal PCR assay with results of immunofluorescence, nucleic acid hybridization, and bacteriologic culture. Animals-6 heifers. Procedure-Heifers were exposed to serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis by conjunctival instillation of 10(6) leptospires on 3 successive days. Urine samples were collected before and after infection. Sensitivity and specificity of 5 PCR assays were compared, to determine the optimal assay for use with bovine urine samples. The optimal PCR assay was then compared with results of bacteriologic culture, nucleic acid hybridization, and immunofluorescence. Results-A PCR assay with the best combination of specificity (100%) and sensitivity (91%) was selected for comparison with the other diagnostic tests. Sensitivity for nucleic acid hybridization was 55%, whereas sensitivity for bacteriologic culture and immunofluorescence was 89 to 93%. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Bacteriologic culture, PCR, and immunofluorescence were sensitive for detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar hardjo type hardjo-bovis in urine specimens of cattle, but a single technique was not the most sensitive for each animal tested. Therefore, the use of 2 techniques in combination is warranted for maximal sensitivity for diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 320
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF AN ELISA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED AND NATURALLY-OCCURRING LEPTOSPIRA-HARDJO INFECTIONS IN CATTLE [J].
BERCOVICH, Z ;
TAAIJKE, R ;
BOKHOUT, BA .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1990, 21 (03) :255-262
[2]  
BOLIN CA, 1989, AM J VET RES, V50, P1001
[3]  
BOLIN CA, 1991, AM J VET RES, V52, P1639
[4]  
BOLIN CA, 1989, AM J VET RES, V50, P2004
[5]  
BOLIN CA, 1989, AM J VET RES, V50, P161
[6]  
BOLIN CA, 1990, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V196, P1601
[7]   IMPROVED MICROTECHNIQUE FOR LEPTOSPIRAL MICROSCOPIC AGGLUTINATION TEST [J].
COLE, JR ;
SULZER, CR ;
PURSELL, AR .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1973, 25 (06) :976-980
[8]   BOVINE LEPTOSPIROSIS - SOME CLINICAL-FEATURES OF SEROVAR HARDJO INFECTION [J].
ELLIS, WA ;
OBRIEN, JJ ;
BRYSON, DG ;
MACKIE, DP .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1985, 117 (05) :101-104
[9]   DIHYDROSTREPTOMYCIN TREATMENT OF BOVINE CARRIERS OF LEPTOSPIRA-INTERROGANS SEROVAR HARDJO [J].
ELLIS, WA ;
MONTGOMERY, J ;
CASSELLS, JA .
RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1985, 39 (03) :292-295
[10]   BOVINE LEPTOSPIROSIS - EXPERIMENTAL-INFECTION OF PREGNANT HEIFERS WITH A STRAIN BELONGING TO HEBDOMADIS SEROGROUP [J].
ELLIS, WA ;
MICHNA, SW .
RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1977, 22 (02) :229-236