Absorption of sunlight by water vapor in cloudy conditions: A partial explanation for the cloud absorption anomaly

被引:93
作者
Crisp, D
机构
[1] Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
[2] MS 241-105, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109
关键词
SCATTERING; PHYSICS;
D O I
10.1029/97GL50245
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The atmospheric radiative transfer algorithms used in most global general circulation models underestimate the globally-averaged solar energy absorbed by cloudy atmospheres by up to 25 W m(-2). The origin of this anomalous absorption is not yet known, but it has been attributed to a variety of sources including oversimplified or missing physical processes in these models, uncertainties in the input data, and even measurement errors. Here, a sophisticated atmospheric radiative transfer model was used to provide a more comprehensive description of the physical processes that contribute to the absorption of solar radiation by the Earth's atmosphere. We found that the amount of sunlight absorbed by a cloudy atmosphere is inversely proportional to the solar zenith angle and the cloud top height, and directly proportional to the cloud optical depth and the water vapor concentration within the clouds. Atmospheres with saturated, optically-thick, low clouds absorbed about 12 W m(-2) more than clear atmospheres. This accounts for about 1/2 to 1/3 of the anomalous absorption. Atmospheres with optically thick middle and high clouds usually absorb less than clear atmospheres. Because water vapor is concentrated within and below the cloud tops, this absorber is most effective at small solar zenith angles. An additional absorber that is distributed at or above the cloud tops is needed to produce the amplitude and zenith angle dependence of the observed anomalous absorption.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 574
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, AtmRe, DOI DOI 10.1016/0169-8095(89)90020-3
[2]   Absorption of solar energy in the atmosphere: Discrepancy between model and observations [J].
Arking, A .
SCIENCE, 1996, 273 (5276) :779-782
[3]  
CESS RD, 1995, SCIENCE, V267, P4926
[4]   THE EFFECT OF CLOUDS ON ATMOSPHERIC ABSORPTION OF SOLAR-RADIATION [J].
CHOU, MD ;
ARKING, A ;
OTTERMAN, J ;
RIDGWAY, WL .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1995, 22 (14) :1885-1888
[5]  
Li ZQ, 1996, J APPL METEOROL, V35, P653, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035<0653:AOASAB>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Microphysical examination of excess cloud absorption in the tropical atmosphere [J].
Lubin, D ;
Chen, JP ;
Pilewskie, P ;
Ramanathan, V ;
Valero, FPJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D12) :16961-16972
[8]  
MCCLATCHEY RA, 1972, ENV RES PAPER, V411
[9]   Ground-based near-infrared observations of the Venus nightside: The thermal structure and water abundance near the surface [J].
Meadows, VS ;
Crisp, D .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 1996, 101 (E2) :4595-4622
[10]   SCATTERING OF LIGHT BY CRYSTALS - A MODIFIED KIRCHHOFF APPROXIMATION [J].
MUINONEN, K .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1989, 28 (15) :3044-3050