Aberrant quantity and localization of Aurora-B/AIM-1 and survivin during megakaryocyte polyploidization and the consequences of Aurora-B/AIM-1-deregulated expression

被引:60
作者
Zhang, Y
Nagata, Y
Yu, GY
Nguyen, HG
Jones, MR
Toselli, P
Jackson, CW
Tatsuka, M
Todokoro, K
Ravid, K
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Whitaker Cardiovasc Inst, Dept Biochem, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Whitaker Cardiovasc Inst, Dept Pharmacol, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] RIKEN, Inst Phys & Chem Res, Cell Fate Signaling Res Unit, Wako, Saitama 35101, Japan
[4] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[5] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Mol Radiobiol, Hiroshima 730, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1182/blood-2003-09-3365
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Megakaryocytes skip late anaphase and cytokinesis during endomitosis. We found normal expression and localization of a fundamental regulator of mitosis, AuroraB/AIM-1, during prophase in polyploidlizing mouse bone marrow megakaryocytes. At late anaphase, however, Aurora-B/AIM-1 is absent or mislocalized. Megakaryocytes treated with a proteasome inhibitor display Aurora-B/AIM-1 properly expressed and localized to the midzone, suggesting that protein degradation contributes to this atypical appearance. In contrast, survivin, an Aurora-B/AIM-1 coregulator of mitosis, is not detected at any stage of the endomitotic cell cycle, and in most megakaryocytes proteasome inhibition does not rescue this phenotype. To further explore the importance of reduced Aurora-B/AIM-1 for polyploidization, it was overexpressed in megakaryocytes of transgenic mice. The phenotype includes increased transgenic mRNA, but not protein, in polyploidly megakaryocytes, further suggesting that Aurora-B/AIM-1 is regulated at the protein level. Aurora-B/ AIM-1 protein is, however, elevated in diploid transgenic megalkaryocytes. Trans genic mice also exhibit enhanced numbers of megakaryocytes with increased proliferative potential, and some mice exhibit mild decreases in ploidy level. Hence, the molecular programming involved in endomitosis is characterized by the mislocalizationor absence of at least 2 critical mitotic regulators, Aurora-B/AIM-1 and survivin. Future studies will examine the impact of survivin restoration on mouse megakaryocyte polyploidlization.(C) 2004 by The American Society of Hematology.
引用
收藏
页码:3717 / 3726
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Chromosomal passengers and the (aurora) ABCs of mitosis [J].
Adams, RR ;
Carmena, M ;
Earnshaw, WC .
TRENDS IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (02) :49-54
[2]   Phosphorylation of the carboxyl terminus of inner centromere protein (INCENP) by the Aurora B kinase stimulates Aurora B kinase activity [J].
Bishop, JD ;
Schumacher, JM .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2002, 277 (31) :27577-27580
[3]   Kinetics of endomitosis in primary murine megakaryocytes [J].
Carow, CE ;
Fox, NE ;
Kaushansky, K .
JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 188 (03) :291-303
[4]   Survivin enhances Aurora-B kinase activity and localizes Aurora-B in human cells [J].
Chen, J ;
Jin, S ;
Tahir, SK ;
Zhang, HC ;
Liu, XS ;
Sarthy, AV ;
McGonigal, TP ;
Liu, ZH ;
Rosenberg, SH ;
Ng, SC .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 278 (01) :486-490
[5]  
CHINNAPPAN D, 2002, CYTOGENET GENOME RES, V98, P231
[6]   S-PHASE-PROMOTING CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASES PREVENT RE-REPLICATION BY INHIBITING THE TRANSITION OF REPLICATION ORIGINS TO A PRE-REPLICATIVE STATE [J].
DAHMANN, C ;
DIFFLEY, JFX ;
NASMYTH, KA .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1995, 5 (11) :1257-1269
[7]  
Datta NS, 1998, CELL GROWTH DIFFER, V9, P639
[8]   Novel alterations in CDK1/cyclin B1 kinase complex formation occur during the acquisition of a polyploid DNA content [J].
Datta, NS ;
Williams, JL ;
Caldwell, J ;
Curry, AM ;
Ashcraft, EK ;
Long, MW .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 1996, 7 (02) :209-223
[9]  
Datta NS, 1996, BLOOD, V88, P1137
[10]   Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores [J].
Ditchfield, C ;
Johnson, VL ;
Tighe, A ;
Ellston, R ;
Haworth, C ;
Johnson, T ;
Mortlock, A ;
Keen, N ;
Taylor, SS .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 2003, 161 (02) :267-280