Symptom improvement in lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib: quality of life analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study BR.21

被引:243
作者
Bezjak, Andrea
Tu, Dongsheng
Seymour, Lesley
Clark, Gary
Trajkovic, Aleksandra
Zukin, Mauro
Ayoub, Joseph
Lago, Sergio
de Albuquerque Ribeiro, Ronaldo
Gerogianni, Alexandra
Cyjon, Arnold
Noble, Jonathan
Laberge, Francis
Chan, Raymond Tsz-Tong
Fenton, David
von Pawel, Joachim
Reck, Martin
Shepherd, Frances A.
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Hosp, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Natl Canc Inst Canada Clin Trials Grp, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] OSI Pharmaceut Inc, Melville, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.05.8073
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose This report describes the quality of life (QOL) findings of a randomized placebo controlled study of erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor, in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods This double-blind phase III trial randomly assigned 731 patients with NSCLC who had progressed after prior chemotherapy to erlotinib 150 mg daily or placebo, with survival as the primary study outcome. QOL was assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and the lung cancer module QLQ-LC13. The primary end points for QOL analysis were time to deterioration of three common lung cancer symptoms: cough, dyspnea, and pain. Results Survival was significantly longer (hazard ratio, 0.70; P<.0001) in the erlotinib arm. Compliance with QOL was 87% at baseline and more than 70% during treatment. Patients receiving erlotinib had significantly longer median time to deterioration for all three symptoms (4.9 v 3.7 months for cough [P=.04]; 4.7 v 2.9 months for dyspnea [P=.04], and 2.8 v 1.9 months for pain [P=.03]). QOL response analyses showed that 44%, 34%, and 42% of patients receiving erlotinib had improvement in these three symptoms, respectively. This was accompanied by a significant improvement in the physical function (31% erlotinib v 19% placebo, P=.01), and global QOL (35% v 26%, P<.0001). Patients with complete or partial response were more likely to have improvement in the QOL response than patients with stable or progressive disease (P<.01). Conclusion Erlotinib not only improves survival in previously treated patients with NSCLC, but also improves tumor-related symptoms and important aspects of QOL.
引用
收藏
页码:3831 / 3837
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]  
ALBERTI W, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P899
[3]   Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer - a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome [J].
Anderson, H. ;
Hopwood, P. ;
Stephens, R. J. ;
Thatcher, N. ;
Cottier, B. ;
Nicholson, M. ;
Milroy, R. ;
Maughan, T. S. ;
Falk, S. J. ;
Bond, M. G. ;
Burt, P. A. ;
Connolly, C. K. ;
McIllmurray, M. B. ;
Carmichael, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (04) :447-453
[4]   THE EORTC QLQ-LC13 - A MODULAR SUPPLEMENT TO THE EORTC CORE QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE (QLQ-C30) FOR USE IN LUNG-CANCER CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BERGMAN, B ;
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
KAASA, S ;
SULLIVAN, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 30A (05) :635-642
[5]   Oncologists' use of quality of life information: Results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians [J].
Bezjak, A ;
Ng, P ;
Skeel, R ;
DePetrillo, AD ;
Comis, R ;
Taylor, KM .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (01) :1-13
[6]   Cancer patients' preferences for communicating clinical trial quality of life information: A qualitative study [J].
Brundage, M ;
Leis, A ;
Bezjak, A ;
Feldman-Stewart, D ;
Degner, L ;
Velji, K ;
Zetes-Zanatta, L ;
Tu, D ;
Ritvo, P ;
Pater, J .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (04) :395-404
[7]   Trading treatment toxicity for survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Brundage, MD ;
Davidson, JR ;
Mackillop, WJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (01) :330-340
[8]   ASSESSING THE RELIABILITY OF 2 TOXICITY SCALES - IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERPRETING TOXICITY DATA [J].
BRUNDAGE, MD ;
PATER, JL ;
ZEE, B .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (14) :1138-1148
[9]   Determining the relationship between toxicity and quality of life in an ovarian cancer chemotherapy clinical trial [J].
Butler, L ;
Bacon, M ;
Carey, M ;
Zee, B ;
Tu, DS ;
Bezjak, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (12) :2461-2468
[10]   What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study 5592 [J].
Cella, D ;
Eton, DT ;
Fairclough, DL ;
Bonomi, P ;
Heyes, AE ;
Silberman, C ;
Wolf, MK ;
Johnson, DH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (03) :285-295